Category Archives: Warrant papers

FL2: Walking away from car at scene of a drive-by shooting left it and was an abandonment

Defendant remained at the scene of a drive by and police in an unmarked car but with POLICE on their vests almost immediately showed up. He left the car and walked away, not to reasonably return. This was an abandonment. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on FL2: Walking away from car at scene of a drive-by shooting left it and was an abandonment

CA2: Failure to leave SW attachment at scene of search doesn’t void the search

That searching officers didn’t leave behind Attachment B to the warrant after the search didn’t void the search. United States v. Whaley, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 16819 (2d Cir. July 10, 2024). Collective knowledge here fails: “Based on the evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA2: Failure to leave SW attachment at scene of search doesn’t void the search

CA4: Officers with arrest warrant for def could enter yard of property they knew he was visiting to arrest him; plain view sustained

Defendant was a social visitor, not a business visitor, and his standing is more like Olson than Carter. The district court erred in finding no standing. On the merits, however, he loses on a ground fully litigated but not decided … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA4: Officers with arrest warrant for def could enter yard of property they knew he was visiting to arrest him; plain view sustained

NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

A typographical error in the statement of probable cause could be overlooked when the affidavit is read as a whole, which is what the court is supposed to do. People v. Malloy, 2024 NY Slip Op 03203, 2024 N.Y. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

Defendant cannot get discovery of FBI 302s just to see if the search warrant was based on whatever information that would disclose. United States v. Purkey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104824 (D. Mont. June 11, 2024). After all, the four … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

C.D.Cal.: SW materials in case with weighty public interest ordered unsealed

The search warrant materials in the LA City Attorney investigation are ordered disclosed because of the weighty public interest in them. In re Consumer Watchdog, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88456 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2024):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SW materials in case with weighty public interest ordered unsealed

Conflict of laws: CA parole search waiver effective in AR

Defendant was arrested in Arkansas on a California extradition warrant, and he had a California parole search waiver. The California search waiver parallels the Arkansas statute, and Arkansas officials could search his clothing under that. In addition, the search incident … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on Conflict of laws: CA parole search waiver effective in AR

E.D.Pa.: Mandamus doesn’t lie to unseal SW papers

A petition for writ of mandamus doesn’t lie parallel to an action before the USMJ to unseal search warrant materials. Martino v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74349 (E.D. Pa. Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Mandamus doesn’t lie to unseal SW papers

OH6: Trial court’s failure to explain RS under Rodriguez required remand

The trial court in denying the motion to suppress didn’t adequately explain the Rodriguez moment and whether there was reasonable suspicion. Remanded. State v. Jeter, 2024-Ohio-1442, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 1356 (6th Dist. Apr. 12, 2024). On the totality of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH6: Trial court’s failure to explain RS under Rodriguez required remand

S.D.Fla.: SW application redacted for discovery for now

For the time being, the search warrant application is redacted in discovery under Rule 6(e). “First, the Special Counsel opposes the disclosure of a search warrant application for Defendant De Oliveira’s Gmail account …. This includes the search warrant itself, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: SW application redacted for discovery for now

CA7: Warranted strip search in a private secure setting was conducted reasonably

“Shaw raises three responses, but they are unavailing. First, he contends that the officers did not follow Wisconsin and local laws that instruct officers to obtain written authorization from a supervisor before a strip search. But a violation of state … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Strip search, Warrant execution, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA7: Warranted strip search in a private secure setting was conducted reasonably

CA7: Not following state and local laws on strip searches doesn’t make one unreasonable

“Shaw raises three responses, but they are unavailing. First, he contends that the officers did not follow Wisconsin and local laws that instruct officers to obtain written authorization from a supervisor before a strip search. But a violation of state … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Stop and frisk, Strip search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA7: Not following state and local laws on strip searches doesn’t make one unreasonable

OH1: Missing notary seal on SW affidavit not an error of constitutional magnitude, so no suppression

A search warrant isn’t void because the affidavit in support was missing a notary seal. The rest of the statutory requirements were satisfied, and this wasn’t an error of constitutional magnitude. State v. Whittle, 2024-Ohio-1023,2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 958 (1st … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OH1: Missing notary seal on SW affidavit not an error of constitutional magnitude, so no suppression

D.C.Cir.: The sealing of SW for def’s Facebook account has no bearing on reversibility of the conviction; release pending appeal denied

Release pending appeal denied. “Fourth, Ballenger has not shown that her arguments regarding the sealing of documents obtained under the search warrant for her Facebook account present a substantial question as to, or had any material impact on, the validity … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: The sealing of SW for def’s Facebook account has no bearing on reversibility of the conviction; release pending appeal denied

CA10: AOL scanned emails for CP, found some, and forwarded to NCMEC; what NCMEC did did not matter and that’s inevitable discovery

“We conclude that the inevitable discovery exception to exclusion applies, and therefore we need not address whether NCMEC violated the Fourth Amendment by opening Tolbert’s emails and attachments or whether the good faith exception to exclusion would apply. The evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Inevitable discovery, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA10: AOL scanned emails for CP, found some, and forwarded to NCMEC; what NCMEC did did not matter and that’s inevitable discovery

D.Utah: Facebook account SW was properly limited to time and to crime under investigation and not overbroad

This Facebook account warrant was properly limited. “First, both warrants here were limited to a time period of about one year, from December 11, 2020, to November 17, 2021. As a result, neither warrant allowed the government to search everything … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Utah: Facebook account SW was properly limited to time and to crime under investigation and not overbroad

D.Minn.: Terry stop with guns drawn was reasonable here

An otherwise lawful Terry stop wasn’t made unreasonable because officers, fearing a weapon, approached with guns drawn. United States v. Thomas, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234913 (D. Minn. Dec. 13, 2023), adopted 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21178 (D. Minn. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Issue preclusion, Stop and frisk, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Terry stop with guns drawn was reasonable here

D.P.R.: Cut-and-paste error that misidentified iPhone model overlooked by correct phone number

The search warrant was for a specific phone number on an iPhone 6S, but the phone with that number was an iPhone 13. Still, the phone number controlled, and the search was valid. Alternatively, on the totality, defendant consented to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, General warrant, Private search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Cut-and-paste error that misidentified iPhone model overlooked by correct phone number

IL: A detention hearing right after arrest is not the place for a suppression hearing

A detention hearing right after arrest is not the place for a suppression hearing. Thus, the detention hearing court did not err in not considering Fourth Amendment issues. People v. Parker, 2024 IL App (1st) 232164, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Warrant papers | Comments Off on IL: A detention hearing right after arrest is not the place for a suppression hearing

Law Review: On Warrants & Waiting: Electronic Warrants & The Fourth Amendment

Tracy Hresko Pearl, On Warrants & Waiting: Electronic Warrants & The Fourth Amendment, 99 Ind. L. J., Issue 1, Article 1 (Winter 2023):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on Law Review: On Warrants & Waiting: Electronic Warrants & The Fourth Amendment