NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

A typographical error in the statement of probable cause could be overlooked when the affidavit is read as a whole, which is what the court is supposed to do. People v. Malloy, 2024 NY Slip Op 03203, 2024 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3282 (3d Dept. June 13, 2024).

There was reasonable suspicion to detain appellant’s mailed package for a dog sniff based on cryptic address for no one there and Express Mail from a source state. United States v. Odubajo, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14323 (6th Cir. June 12, 2024).

Defendant was in the search warrant and wiretap affidavits as “unknown male,” but he allegedly knew his identity. “But Defendant has not shown that Agent Wohlfert knew or should have known Defendant’s identity and intentionally omitted it from his affidavits, nor that the unknown nature of Defendant’s identity was necessary to the findings of probable cause in each search warrant or wiretap. So, Defendant’s Motion will be denied.” United States v. Delgado, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104619 (E.D. Mich. June 12, 2024)* (just in the abstract, materiality is a stretch).

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Probable cause, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.