FL2: Walking away from car at scene of a drive-by shooting left it and was an abandonment

Defendant remained at the scene of a drive by and police in an unmarked car but with POLICE on their vests almost immediately showed up. He left the car and walked away, not to reasonably return. This was an abandonment. Muhammad v. State, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 5550 (2d DCA July 17, 2024).

Defendant’s request for information of his cell phone held by the police is moot. He asked for it, but he can’t remember the passcode. The government doesn’t think there’s anything on the phone worth pursuing. When it was suggested that the phone be shipped off to have the passcode overriden by a defense expert of his choosing, the motion is withdrawn and now moot. [If so, the contents would have to be shared with the government.] United States v. Riese, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125164 (D.S.D. May 23, 2024).*

This inmate filed a public records request for his“ arrest warrant[;] arrest warrant return; DNA search warrant; DNA search warrant supporting affidavit and/or complaint; DNA search warrant return; Cell phone search warrant; Cell phone search warrant supporting affidavit and/or complaint; Cell phone search warrant return.” Therefore, the clerk can’t comply. State ex rel. Curtis v. Turner, 2024-Ohio-2682, 2024 Ohio LEXIS 1435 (July 17, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Waiver, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.