Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Wash.: No exclusion where alleged misconduct was not flagrant

Here, there was the intervening circumstance of an arrest warrant. There was also probable cause. United States v. Howell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10557 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 21, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No exclusion where alleged misconduct was not flagrant

CA7: Even if police potentially escalated the situation, ptf’s use of a gun justified deadly force

Even if the officers failed to properly announce themselves and even if the defendants’ actions exacerbated the possibility of a dangerous confrontation, Ancheta’s action, the use of his gun, was an intervening cause of the deadly force. The defendants escalated … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Consent, Excessive force, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on CA7: Even if police potentially escalated the situation, ptf’s use of a gun justified deadly force

E.D.Pa.: Warrantless “emergency” entry without an emergency violated 4A but no suppression for isolated negligent act

Police did a “hit and hold” on defendant’s house without a warrant, a tactic reserved for emergencies. This was not, but it was an isolated act of negligence so the exclusionary rule will not be applied. United States v. Walker, … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Warrantless “emergency” entry without an emergency violated 4A but no suppression for isolated negligent act

E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

The anonymous report about a man threatening others in Queens adequately described defendant but it provided nothing to show that there was a crime in the offing. The stop and search was without reasonable suspicion. “On this record, it is … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

MA: Community caretaking transport of juvenile permits patdown for safety

A patdown of a juvenile found with gang members being taken to his caregiver was reasonable for safety purposes under the community caretaking function. Commonwealth v. Demos D., 105 Mass. App. Ct. 193 (Jan. 17, 2025). Reasonable suspicion not required … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MA: Community caretaking transport of juvenile permits patdown for safety

E.D.N.Y.: Sec. 702 FISA searches require a warrant for U.S. persons

Sec. 702 FISA searches require a warrant for U.S. persons. United States v. Hasbajrami, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238018 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2024), filed with CISO and unsealed Jan. 21, 2025), on remand from United States v. Hasbajrami, 945 F.3d … Continue reading

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Sec. 702 FISA searches require a warrant for U.S. persons

D.C.Cir.: Compelling defendant to unlock his phone was a 5A testimonial act

Compelling defendant to unlock his phone was a testimonial act under Hubbell, and it had to be suppressed. (Deciding the Fifth Amendment claim moots need to decide the Fourth Amendment claim.) United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1219 … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: Compelling defendant to unlock his phone was a 5A testimonial act

ABA CJ: Predictive Policing Algorithms and the Fourth Amendment

Dominic A. Weiss, Predictive Policing Algorithms and the Fourth Amendment, ABA Criminal Justice 15 (Winter 2025) Leveraging Predictive Policing Algorithms to Restore Fourth Amendment Protections in High-Crime Areas in a Post-Wardlow World by Kelly Koss. Abstract:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABA CJ: Predictive Policing Algorithms and the Fourth Amendment

M.D.Fla.: Denying knowledge of the car involved was a lack of standing

Denying knowledge of the car involved was a lack of standing. United States v. Powers, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237574 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 18, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8322 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2025). “The totality of the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Denying knowledge of the car involved was a lack of standing

CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

Where defendant was convicted of making threats over the internet to a Congressman, a two year computer monitoring condition was reasonable and did not violate the First and Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hall, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1109 (3d … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Excessive force, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

D.Ariz.: USPO can turn phone seized in supervised release over to FBI

It was not improper for the PO to turn defendant’s phone over to the FBI to search it when it was already lawfully seized. “This is not a stalking horse case.” The delay was not unreasonable. United States v. Fuller, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: USPO can turn phone seized in supervised release over to FBI

Reason: “the Supreme Court’s oral argument yesterday in Barnes v. Felix will be noteworthy.”

Reason: Prof. Robert Leider on the arguments in Barnes v. Felix by Will Baude: Professor Robert Leider, who writes in both constitutional law and criminal law, passed along these comments on the Supreme Court’s recent oral argument in an excessive … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: “the Supreme Court’s oral argument yesterday in Barnes v. Felix will be noteworthy.”

E.D.Mich.: “Imprint” of a gun in the pocket can be RS def is carrying

The “imprint” of a gun in the pocket can be reasonable suspicion defendant is carrying. United States v. Morris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8729 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 16, 2025). Defendant is charged with six Hobbs Act robberies. His vehicle was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: “Imprint” of a gun in the pocket can be RS def is carrying

D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

Defendant’s motion in limine about whether a search warrant was utilized is denied. The government can refer incidentally to the search. United States v. Djan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8285 (D.R.I. Jan. 10, 2025). Officers had reasonable suspicion for the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

E.D.Tenn.: Applying the Sixth Circuit’s “drug dealer inference,” PC exists for the SW for def’s house

Applying the “drug dealer inference” for nexus, the court finds probable cause to believe defendant was dealing drugs from his house to support the search warrant. United States v. Evans, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8686 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2025):

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Applying the Sixth Circuit’s “drug dealer inference,” PC exists for the SW for def’s house

CA9: Consent obtained by trickery is not voluntary

Consent obtained by trickery is not voluntary. United States v. Beland, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1019 (9th Cir. Jan. 16, 2025). “[T]here is no indication from the record that the consent was in any way coerced, that Fiallos-Pena and Verganza … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA9: Consent obtained by trickery is not voluntary

NY3: Inventory didn’t comply with dept. policy and there was no full inventory

Defendant’s traffic stop was valid, but the state failed to show the impoundment complied with departmental policies. There was no evidence the vehicle was unsecured or unsafe if left at the scene. The inventory search failed to follow departmental procedures … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NY3: Inventory didn’t comply with dept. policy and there was no full inventory

C.D.Cal.: Running criminal history of passenger unreasonably prolonged the stop

The stop was valid, but the stop was unreasonably prolonged without reasonable suspicion when running the criminal history of the passenger. That was not part of the incidents of the traffic stop. The frisk was also unreasonable. Also, “The Court … Continue reading

Posted in Independent source, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Running criminal history of passenger unreasonably prolonged the stop

D.Minn.: The fact a gun wasn’t found in def’s car doesn’t mean there wasn’t PC to search

“Defendant’s flight from law enforcement is, however, not the only basis to support the existence of probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime or contraband would be found in the Jeep. The probable cause to search the Jeep … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The fact a gun wasn’t found in def’s car doesn’t mean there wasn’t PC to search

AR: “[T]he exclusionary rule—absent a showing of bad faith—does not apply in a revocation hearing.”

“[T]he exclusionary rule—absent a showing of bad faith—does not apply in a revocation hearing.” Wallace v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 19 (Jan. 15, 2025). An officer on patrol in a motel parking lot saw defendant’s car. They drove past each … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on AR: “[T]he exclusionary rule—absent a showing of bad faith—does not apply in a revocation hearing.”