E.D.N.Y.: Anonymous report of man threatening others with a gun didn’t provide RS

The anonymous report about a man threatening others in Queens adequately described defendant but it provided nothing to show that there was a crime in the offing. The stop and search was without reasonable suspicion. “On this record, it is clear that the officers lacked an objectively reasonable basis to conclude that Burvick was ‘presently armed and dangerous’ at the moment when, over four minutes into their encounter, Vanzanten finally decided to pat down Burvick’s legs and search inside Burvick’s pockets without his consent. Each of the government’s proffered justifications for the frisk are addressed in turn below.” United States v. Burvick, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9527 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 17, 2025).

Defendant seeks to preclude admission of a “white binding agent” seized under a warrant from trial, but cites nothing in support. It comes in subject to cross examination. It’s relevant. United States v. Taylor, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9729 (D. Conn. Jan. 20, 2025).*

There was probable cause defendant’s truck was in the District of Delaware when the search warrant for it was issued. The warrant isn’t overbroad, and the good faith exception would apply. United States v. Morrison, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10138 (D. Del. Jan. 21, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.