Author Archives: Hall

CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

A detective’s omission of a critical fact that was not yet known is not a Franks violation. “What is undisputed, at least at this point, is that Detective Bowles did not actually know that the fire captain had described the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA8: Omission of a fact not yet known is not a Franks violation

CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s seizure on the totality. But, “Sierra-Ayala’s intervening volitional act, in the absence of exploitative behavior by López-Maysonet, renders the discovery of the drugs sufficiently attenuated so as to dissipate the taint of the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA1: Voluntary act after unreasonable stop made evidence admissible

NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. People who live in a “high crime area” do not have lesser constitutional protection. The facts here just didn’t support a frisk, and he had a right to refuse one, and that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NJ: Refusal of a frisk without RS does not add to RS

CA8: PC shown but for nexus, but GFE overcame that

The district court held the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t say enough to supply nexus to defendant’s home, but the good faith exception applied. Affirmed. The affidavit was sufficient for probable cause defendant was involved in dealing drugs, and … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA8: PC shown but for nexus, but GFE overcame that

D.Md.: Def did not go to trial because counsel misstated the chances of success of a suppression motion

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel of counsel claim for allegedly misstating the chances of success of a suppression motion is rejected. It was complex but not frivolous, and it was rejected and affirmed on appeal. Defense counsel didn’t misstate anything. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: Def did not go to trial because counsel misstated the chances of success of a suppression motion

N.D.Ind.: Typo in SW home address was cured by picture of house

A typo in defendant’s home address was not prejudicial where there was a picture of the house included in the warrant. Thus, no ineffective assistance of counsel for not challenging it. Kassay v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116669 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Typo in SW home address was cured by picture of house

E.D.Ark.: Def’s statements disassociating himself from the premises searched showed no standing

Defendant had some connection to the premises, but his disassociation from the premises when asked about it by the police showed his lack of standing. “To resolve his motion to suppress, however, the Court need not determine whether these possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Def’s statements disassociating himself from the premises searched showed no standing

CA11: Reasonable mistake of law on basis for stop was not 4A violation

“An officer’s reasonable mistake of law—that is, when ‘the law turns out to be not what was thought’—can justify probable cause. [Heien] at 61-64. The officer ‘deserve[s] a margin of error’ when ‘the application of a statute is unclear—however clear … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Reasonable mistake of law on basis for stop was not 4A violation

M.D.La.: Car could be searched when it was stopped near home being searched with SW

“[O]fficers were entitled to search the car pursuant to the warrant because Defendant was stopped within the immediate vicinity of his residence.” United States v. Clayton, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116345 (M.D. La. June 30, 2022).* During a traffic stop, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Car could be searched when it was stopped near home being searched with SW

S.D.Fla.: A § 1983 case over pre-Kraft video surveillance dismissed for QI

In another court ordered video surveillance massage parlor case, this time a § 1983 case, the surveillance order was pre-Kraft where the 4th DCA suppressed surveillance there, so the defendants get qualified immunity. Taig v. Currey, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: A § 1983 case over pre-Kraft video surveillance dismissed for QI

CA8: Independent source justified search despite illegal protective sweep

“Herbert Green previously appealed the denial of his motion to suppress drugs and firearms discovered in his apartment during a law enforcement search outside the scope of the police’s warrant. See United States v. Green, 9 F.4th 682, 691-93 (8th … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Independent source, Inventory, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA8: Independent source justified search despite illegal protective sweep

CA11: Anonymous tip of bad driving corroborated by seeing it themselves

Anonymous report of bad driving led officers to observe defendant who saw it themselves. The stop was justified. United States v. Menendez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18232 (11th Cir. July 1, 2022). Defendant was suspected of building, buying, and selling … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Anonymous tip of bad driving corroborated by seeing it themselves

S.D.Ind.: Inordinate delay in producing cell phone search discovery doesn’t justify dismissal

The government’s untimely discovery response to defendant’s repeated requests for the product of his cell phone search doesn’t warrant dismissal of the indictment. Probable cause was shown for the cell phone search, and the motion to suppress is denied. United … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Inordinate delay in producing cell phone search discovery doesn’t justify dismissal

E.D.Va.: No RS for protective sweep of car for weapon

The officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a protective sweep of defendant’s car. His actions did not support any suggestion he might be armed. United States v. Trice, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115463 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2022).* Defendant’s refusal to … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: No RS for protective sweep of car for weapon

CO: Dog sniff after legal possession became law suppressed; no RS

A dog sniff after Amendment 64 legalized personal possession of marijuana in Colorado was unjustified, unreasonable, and suppressed. Other case law already put the issue in doubt before this search occurred. There was no reason to suspect the occupants of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CO: Dog sniff after legal possession became law suppressed; no RS

N.D.Cal.: Another round in the Google sale of consumer information case

In the ongoing Google privacy case involving its selling of personal information, another motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. In re Google RTB Consumer Priv. Litig., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115023 (N.D. Cal. June 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Another round in the Google sale of consumer information case

S.D.Ga.: Exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply to equal protection challenge to stop

A subjective intent (Whren) argument not presented to the USMJ is rejected. Even if the court got to the merits, the exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply to an equal protection challenge. United States v. Lewis, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115137 (S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Exclusionary rule wouldn’t apply to equal protection challenge to stop

WaPo: Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about everyone

WaPo: Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about everyone by Geoffrey A. Fowler (“In post-Roe America, Google searches and location records can be evidence of a crime. Here are four ways Google should protect civil rights in its … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about everyone

Forbes: Warrants Can Force Google To Look Through Your Search History–A Tragic Arson Case May Decide If That’s Constitutional

Forbes: Warrants Can Force Google To Look Through Your Search History–A Tragic Arson Case May Decide If That’s Constitutional by Thomas Brewster (“This week, Mike Price, counsel for Seymour and Fourth Amendment Center litigation director at the National Association of … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Forbes: Warrants Can Force Google To Look Through Your Search History–A Tragic Arson Case May Decide If That’s Constitutional

GA: Product of state search warrant could be analyzed by federal officers

The fact a search warrant was directed to all peace officers of the State of Georgia didn’t preclude the state from turning the evidence over to the Secret Service for forensic analysis. Oliver v. State, 2022 Ga. App. LEXIS 344 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: Product of state search warrant could be analyzed by federal officers