Author Archives: Hall

E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

It’s not constitutionally required to show that a cell phone was actually used in a crime for probable cause to search it. It’s enough that it likely could have. “A law enforcement-affiant’s personal expertise combined with attestation to a defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

TN: No standing in someone else’s curtilage

Defendant pulled his car into a convenient driveway for his stop, but he had no standing in the curtilage because it wasn’t his place. The car he had standing in, but this was a plain view. State v. Gunn, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No standing in someone else’s curtilage

PA: RS not needed to seize firearm on car seat in plain view during traffic stop

The inherent dangers in a traffic stop justified the officer doing a protective sweep to seize a firearm on the seat in plain view, despite lack of any sense that defendant was going to use it. Commonwealth v. Hawkins-Davenport, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: RS not needed to seize firearm on car seat in plain view during traffic stop

AR: Trial counsel’s comment motion to suppress ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel

A motion to suppress once made and denied doesn’t have to be renewed during the proof. Trial counsel’s statement that the ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel to raise it, but it loses on the merits anyway. Cobb v. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Trial counsel’s comment motion to suppress ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel

Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You.

Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You. by Frank Figliuzzi (FBI retired):

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You.

E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

“This case arises from an officer shooting the target of a search warrant. Detective Thomas Strode obtained a warrant to search Don Clark’s residence for illegal guns and drugs. As officers entered without knocking, Clark shot at the officers but … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

IA approves residence indicia warrant

This was a search warrant for indicia of defendant’s residence. State v. Uranga, 2026 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 20 (Feb. 13, 2026) (§ 56.18 n.2). Defendant was tried in 2012 and if his counsel had made a motion to suppress cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on IA approves residence indicia warrant

OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

Cleveland’s city elevator inspector got permission from the maintenance persons at three apartment buildings in Cleveland to conduct regular inspections. This was all by consent. The court thus does not have to decide whether the inspections were also valid as … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

D.Conn.: Officers muting microphones to discuss extending stop helped show Rodriguez violation

The stop was justified, but the stop was unreasonably extended for the drug dog that didn’t alert. Then the officers muted their microphones for 40 seconds before a search of defendant’s person. “The officers’ choice to spend several minutes on … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Officers muting microphones to discuss extending stop helped show Rodriguez violation

IN: Jamming to music or twitching from drugs?

So, was defendant’s jerking movement in his car at 8 am him “jamming” or “grooving” to music or under the influence of a stimulant drug? Not enough here for reasonable suspicion. This is but a hunch. Wilson v. State, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Jamming to music or twitching from drugs?

CA3: Second protective sweep was justified by noise inside

The premises had been subjected to a protective sweep seeing firearms, locked up, and a search warrant was sought. Officers heard a noise inside and came in and found defendant and he’d apparently moved one of the guns. The initial … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Second protective sweep was justified by noise inside

CNN: Fulton County accuses Justice Department of misleading the judge who approved elections office search warrant

CNN: Fulton County accuses Justice Department of misleading the judge who approved elections office search warrant by Tierney Sneed (“Officials in Fulton County, Georgia, accused the Justice Department of making “serious” omissions in the application the FBI filed to obtain … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CNN: Fulton County accuses Justice Department of misleading the judge who approved elections office search warrant

D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

The search of defendant’s car was unreasonable under the automobile exception because there was no probable cause to believe drugs or other evidence would be found there. Also, the inventory was invalid. United States v. Lujan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

D.Vt.: SW for CP was specific enough to prevent a general search of devices

The warrant for CSAM was specific enough and didn’t permitt and unlimited search of the devices. “Although the language of the warrant issued here could have been drafted more artfully, the court finds the limiting language sufficiently connects the items … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Vt.: SW for CP was specific enough to prevent a general search of devices

M.D.Fla.: In a 2254, court can decide petitioner loses on merits or deny relief on Stone, as it chooses

2254 petitioner loses on the merits of his Fourth Amendment claim, and the court can opt to do that or apply Stone and not decide it. Evans v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29920 n.2 (M.D. Fla. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In a 2254, court can decide petitioner loses on merits or deny relief on Stone, as it chooses

Sixth edition 15% off today

Here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Sixth edition 15% off today

TN: Helicopter flyover of MJ patch violated no REP

Really low helicopter flyover [“lower than a cellphone tower”] of defendant’s property seeing a marijuana grow violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. [What if it was a drone and not a helicopter? A pole camera? Private surveillance satellite?] State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TN: Helicopter flyover of MJ patch violated no REP

MA: Unreasonable exit order under MA law led to invalid consent

An unreasonable exit order here led to alleged consent, but the court finds consent tainted by the order. No factors of attenuation favor the state. Commonwealth v. Robinson, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 49 (Feb. 13, 2026):

Posted in Attenuation, Consent | Comments Off on MA: Unreasonable exit order under MA law led to invalid consent

N.D.Ga.: The Fulton County GA 2020 ballot seizure case is ordered unsealed

The Fulton County 2020 ballot seizure case is ordered unsealed. Pitts v. United States, No. 1:26-MI-00012-JPB, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28859 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2026). (Case number provided for Pacer users. I read the affidavit for warrant, and there … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: The Fulton County GA 2020 ballot seizure case is ordered unsealed

CA8: Stop unreasonably extended for drug dog; denial of suppression reversed

Window tint violation should have taken 5-6 minutes, but it dragged out for 20 minutes while the drug dog was coming. The stop was overlong under Rodriguez and the motion to suppress should have been granted. United States v. Johnson, … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Stop unreasonably extended for drug dog; denial of suppression reversed