Monthly Archives: February 2025

W.D.N.Y.: CA2’s deciding search issue in direct appeal with GFE, too, did not violate “party presentation” rule

The Second Circuit upheld the search in this case and threw in an alternative ground, the good faith exception. On habeas, that did not violate the “party presentation” rule where the parties decide the issues to litigate, not the court. … Continue reading

Posted in Standards of review, Uncategorized | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: CA2’s deciding search issue in direct appeal with GFE, too, did not violate “party presentation” rule

CA4: Ptf’s arrest was with PC even though he was later exonerated in 65 days by same officers

Plaintiff was arrested for a double murder on probable cause. The officers continued investigating [as they should] and exculpated him, and he was released after 65 days in jail with charges dropped. He sued the officers for the arrest, but … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Ptf’s arrest was with PC even though he was later exonerated in 65 days by same officers

W.D.Mich.: A motorist can be ordered from the car during a traffic stop

In 1977, 48 years ago, SCOTUS held in Pennsylvania v. Mimms that officers could order a motorist out of the car during a traffic stop, and that’s not unreasonable today. [We’re still seeing challenges to that for extending a stop … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: A motorist can be ordered from the car during a traffic stop

E.D.Okla.: Geofence warrant held 4A violation with no GFE

The R&R recommended suppression of the geofence warrant. It is adopted. The warrant caused a wholesale search and was based on what appears to be a slipshod effort. Even the good faith exception didn’t apply. United States v. Fuentes, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Geofence warrant held 4A violation with no GFE

CA7: No trespassing sign on driveway didn’t prevent animal control officer from walking up driveway

No trespassing sign at plaintiff’s driveway didn’t make the animal control officer’s entry onto the driveway a Fourth Amendment violation. Also, “[t]he argument that a land patent exempts Shaw’s property from the law is frivolous.” Shaw v. Hall, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on CA7: No trespassing sign on driveway didn’t prevent animal control officer from walking up driveway

D.N.H.: Affidavit for SW showed def’s standing

“Examining the totality of the circumstances, the evidence shows that the officers reasonably believed that Guerrero-Nuñez lived in Apartment 204 and would be present when they entered the apartment. As such, their entry into the apartment did not violate Guerrero-Nuñez’s … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Affidavit for SW showed def’s standing

CA2: Alleged inconsistencies in dog handler’s testimony didn’t necessarily make him unbelievable

“Any inconsistent testimony Fisher gave as to the dog’s ‘alerts’ and ‘indications’ arose out of a confusion of vocabulary rather than lack of credibility, as made evident by the district court’s request that Fisher clarify and not conflate the terms. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Alleged inconsistencies in dog handler’s testimony didn’t necessarily make him unbelievable

D.Alaska: It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut def’s losses

It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut defendant’s losses. No ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24036 (D. Alaska Jan. 8, 2025).* The cell phone warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Alaska: It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut def’s losses

OR: Officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable

The officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable. State v. Starr, 337 Or. App. 682 (Feb. 12, 2025).* There was probable cause to believe blood on the cell phone was defendant’s justifying the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Officer’s use of a flashlight to facilitate a plan view at night was reasonable

ID: Officer’s subjective belief drug dog alerted can be sufficient for PC

The officer’s subjective belief the drug dog alerted can be sufficient for probable cause. Here, it’s based on the officer’s training and experience. State v. Morgan, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 6 (Feb. 12, 2025):

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on ID: Officer’s subjective belief drug dog alerted can be sufficient for PC

MO: GPS monitoring of a sex offender after release was reasonable

F.S.’s expectation of privacy is diminished as a convicted felon and registered sex offender, and the GPS monitoring’s intrusion on her privacy is slight. The state has a legitimate interest in protecting children and other potential victims from sex crimes. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: GPS monitoring of a sex offender after release was reasonable

S.D.Ohio: Stone bar applies regardless of the merits of the 4A claim

The Stone bar applies regardless of the merits of the Fourth Amendment claim. Wood v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24460 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2025).* Notice pleading in Fourth Amendment § 1983 claims: “Plaintiff alleges that … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Stone bar applies regardless of the merits of the 4A claim

D.Minn.: That officers could have been more careful and detailed in monitoring the CI doesn’t show a lack of PC

“Mr. Turner is correct that the use of a CRI during drug investigations is common. Moreover, the Court does not disagree that officers could have taken additional steps to yield an even higher degree of confidence that Mr. Turner was … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Minn.: That officers could have been more careful and detailed in monitoring the CI doesn’t show a lack of PC

CA9: Use of Taser in dart-mode wasn’t excessive force because it was justified

“An officer’s use of a Taser in dart-mode ‘constitute[s] an intermediate, significant level of force.’ … But under the Graham factors, Officer Swindling’s brief Taser use was justified under the circumstances. First, Sharif had assaulted his daughter’s mother; stolen a … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on CA9: Use of Taser in dart-mode wasn’t excessive force because it was justified

CA8: False statement van was “secured” was based on secondhand information and was neither material or reckless

The officer’s statement that defendant’s van was “secured” was not sufficient false and misleading to even be reckless. The officer was passing on information from other officers about the van, but the windows were missing and it was accessible. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: False statement van was “secured” was based on secondhand information and was neither material or reckless

D.P.R.: Statement taken in violation of Miranda likely usable for impeachment

Defendant’s statement allegedly in violation of Miranda that the government doesn’t intend to use may be used for impeachment if the defendant contradicts them under Harris. United States v. Cardona, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22757 (D.P.R. Feb. 6, 2025). Inferences … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Statement taken in violation of Miranda likely usable for impeachment

FourthAmendment.com in Feedspot’s 100 Best Legal Blogs and Websites in 2025

Informed today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FourthAmendment.com in Feedspot’s 100 Best Legal Blogs and Websites in 2025

OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

Officers had reasonable suspicion to initiate a brief investigative stop of defendant based on the totality of the circumstances, including the citizen’s tip, the late hour, the location, and the defendant’s suspicious behavior upon seeing them. Placing him in the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

Orin S. Kerr, The Two Tests of Search Law: Reconciling Katz and Jones

Orin S. Kerr, The Two Tests of Search Law: Reconciling Katz and Jones on SSRN. Abstract:

Posted in Constitutionally protected area, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on Orin S. Kerr, The Two Tests of Search Law: Reconciling Katz and Jones

CA11: Potential new Franks violation not enough for third successor habeas

This is petitioner’s third successor habeas attempt. This one claims new information might make a Franks violation. Except that it doesn’t qualify for permission to proceed as a successor. In re Obeginski, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806 (11th Cir. Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Potential new Franks violation not enough for third successor habeas