S.D.Ohio: Stone bar applies regardless of the merits of the 4A claim

The Stone bar applies regardless of the merits of the Fourth Amendment claim. Wood v. Warden, Noble Corr. Inst., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24460 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 11, 2025).*

Notice pleading in Fourth Amendment § 1983 claims: “Plaintiff alleges that he is currently on parole, and that two parole agents conducted a search of his residence. The only information alleged to support his position that this search was not reasonable, is that it was based on ‘second party hearsay.’ Thus, it appears that the parole agents searched Plaintiff’s home based on information supplied by another person. Plaintiff does not describe what that third person told them. Because Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims against the Parole Agents lack adequate detail they should be dismissed for failure to state a claim.” Engle v. Kieski, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21699 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 2025).*

The ADA at defendant’s probable cause hearing didn’t have anything to do with plaintiff’s arrest. To the extent the sparse allegations in the complaint can be discerned, he’s absolutely immune for what he actually did because it was in court. Garza v. Barella, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21768 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 6, 2025).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.