Monthly Archives: October 2015

D.R.I.: Receiving three packages from China over time was not probable cause

Defendant received three packages over time from China and the Postal Inspector admitted there was no probable cause after receipt of the second, and the court finds there wasn’t for the third either. China may be an exporter of controlled … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Receiving three packages from China over time was not probable cause

CT: CI said he was a regular purchaser of MJ from def; that overcame 11 day staleness challenge

The CI said he was a regular purchaser of marijuana from defendant, and thus the fact that the last was eleven days before the warrant was not stale. State v. Flores, 2015 Conn. LEXIS 289 (Oct. 20, 2015). Defendant was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on CT: CI said he was a regular purchaser of MJ from def; that overcame 11 day staleness challenge

VI: Vehicle matching description of car in robbery fleeing and crashing into police car is PC for stop

Officers had probable cause to stop defendant’s vehicle as being involved in a robbery. They set up a “choke point” on the flight route away and saw the vehicle, and the driver fled from multiple attempts to stop it. Then … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: Vehicle matching description of car in robbery fleeing and crashing into police car is PC for stop

OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

Police answered a loud music call at 5 am in an apartment building, and they could smell burning marijuana outside defendant’s apartment door. Burning marijuana is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency for a police entry. A 1995 Ohio case … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH7: Burning MJ coming from an apartment is a misdemeanor and not sufficient exigency to enter

D.Neb.: A mere passenger in a car used in a robbery has no standing to challenge the search

Riding in a car to a robbery is not a “sufficiently close connection to the car” to give standing. There was at least reasonable suspicion for the stop based on the robbery call, and then probable cause for their arrest. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Neb.: A mere passenger in a car used in a robbery has no standing to challenge the search

S.D.N.Y.: Not reading the consent form doesn’t make it involuntary; neither does threat to “tear the place apart,” which was disputed

The fact defendant didn’t read the consent form doesn’t make it involuntary. Not reading it was defendant’s choice. “This leaves the agents’ purported threat to ‘tear the apartment apart’ if they obtained a warrant — something the Government contends never … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Not reading the consent form doesn’t make it involuntary; neither does threat to “tear the place apart,” which was disputed

San Diego Union-Tribune: Feds say border agent harassed brother’s accuser

San Diego Union-Tribune: Feds say border agent harassed brother’s accuser by Kristina Davis: Border Patrol supervisor charged with targeting man who accused family member of molestation…A U.S. Border Patrol supervisor is accused of using his law enforcement authority to repeatedly … Continue reading

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on San Diego Union-Tribune: Feds say border agent harassed brother’s accuser

NYTimes: Obama Won’t Seek Access to Encrypted User Data

NYTimes: Obama Won’t Seek Access to Encrypted User Data by Nicole Perlroth and David E. Sanger: The Obama administration has backed down in its bitter dispute with Silicon Valley over the encryption of data on iPhones and other digital devices, … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Obama Won’t Seek Access to Encrypted User Data

N.D.Ga.: Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window

Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window in the warrant. Phone conversations between defendant and his lawyer over the jail phone system were not subject to attorney-client privilege because there was … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Forfeiture, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window

WI: Police had independent source of information of CP to search computer seized in connection with wife’s suicide investigation

Defendant’s wife allegedly committed suicide. In the investigation, the police interviewed their daughter and she said that her mother was using her computer just before her death. The computer was seized as a part of the suicide investigation. Later the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Computer and cloud searches, Independent source | Comments Off on WI: Police had independent source of information of CP to search computer seized in connection with wife’s suicide investigation

CA9: Intoxicated man freely consented to searches; actions show he knew what he was doing

Intoxicated man freely consented to searches. “Although Smith appeared intoxicated during the two searches, he had already begun cleaning the crime scene, gave his own version of the events, was able to answer the officer’s questions and sign the consent … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Intoxicated man freely consented to searches; actions show he knew what he was doing

AP (via WTOP): Private database lets police skirt license plate data limits

AP (via WTOP): Private database lets police skirt license plate data limits by Tami Abdollah: For years, police nationwide have used patrol car-mounted scanners to automatically photograph and log the whereabouts of peoples’ cars, uploading the images into databases they’ve … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on AP (via WTOP): Private database lets police skirt license plate data limits

WaPo: Police withhold videos despite vows of transparency

WaPo: Police withhold videos despite vows of transparency by Kimberly Kindy and Julie Tate: But officers investigated in fatal shootings are routinely given access to body camera footage.

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on WaPo: Police withhold videos despite vows of transparency

TechDirt: Defendants Counter Government’s Arguments That Appeals Court Should Treat Cellphones As ‘Personal Homing Beacons’

TechDirt: Defendants Counter Government’s Arguments That Appeals Court Should Treat Cellphones As ‘Personal Homing Beacons’ by Tim Cushing. A couple of weeks ago, the government petitioned the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for an en banc rehearing of its decision … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on TechDirt: Defendants Counter Government’s Arguments That Appeals Court Should Treat Cellphones As ‘Personal Homing Beacons’

NPR: In A First, Border Agent Indicted For Killing Mexican Teen Across Fence

NPR: In A First, Border Agent Indicted For Killing Mexican Teen Across Fence by John Burnett: On Friday, in a federal courtroom in Tucson, Ariz., an agent of the U.S. Border Patrol for the first time will be arraigned on … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on NPR: In A First, Border Agent Indicted For Killing Mexican Teen Across Fence

MO: Omission from affidavit that CI was “working off a case” not material–it’s virtually a given

An alleged material omission for Franks purposes was not material because adding it in would essentially be misleading. Telling the issuing magistrate that the CI was “working off a case” isn’t really required under Franks because that’s usually a given … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MO: Omission from affidavit that CI was “working off a case” not material–it’s virtually a given

M.D.N.C.: Refusal to consent during knock-and-talk when smell of MJ was strong and a yell back inside was exigency

Officers did a knock-and-talk and they could smell marijuana before the knock. When defendant opened the door, the smell was stronger. He refused to consent and refused entry. He turned and yelled something inside and came outside. When he pulled … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Refusal to consent during knock-and-talk when smell of MJ was strong and a yell back inside was exigency

E.D.La.: Robert Durst case: One does not lose REP in a hotel room by registering under an alias

Robert Durst was believed to be on the run after the HBO series “The Jinx,” where he allegedly admitted a connection to a 10 year old homicide in Los Angeles. He was found by the FBI in the Marriott in … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Robert Durst case: One does not lose REP in a hotel room by registering under an alias

Wired: California Now Has the Nation’s Best Digital Privacy Law

Wired: California Now Has the Nation’s Best Digital Privacy Law by Kim Zetter CALIFORNIA CONTINUED ITS long-standing tradition for forward-thinking privacy laws today when Governor Jerry Brown signed a sweeping law protecting digital privacy rights. The landmark Electronic Communications Privacy … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, ECPA | Comments Off on Wired: California Now Has the Nation’s Best Digital Privacy Law

NC: Federal civil rights 12(b)(6) dismissal not “adjudication on the merits” for collateral estoppel in state court

Dismissal of a Fourth Amendment civil rights claim under the federal heightened pleading standard was not an “adjudication on the merits” for collateral estoppel in state court. Fox v. Johnson, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 814 (October 6, 2015):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on NC: Federal civil rights 12(b)(6) dismissal not “adjudication on the merits” for collateral estoppel in state court