E.D.Mich.: Person a cell phone was given to as gift could consent to search

Defendant gave an old cell phone to his niece. On it, she found child pornography, and she took it to the police who she showed images and texts. The officer didn’t search. She had apparent authority to consent to search of the phone. United States v. Lewis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192542 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 26, 2026).

The search here occurred just before the Ohio courts started holding that the advent of recreational marijuana meant the smell of marijuana in a car wasn’t probable cause. The trial court didn’t rule on good faith, and it’s remanded to the trial court to determine that. State v. Anderson, 2026-Ohio-3329 (1st Dist. Aug. 26, 2026).*

There were two search warrants for two properties of defendant, and one the state wouldn’t rely on at trial. The affidavits were similar and supported each other. The state’s failure to put the one into evidence that didn’t matter to them didn’t justify suppressing the other. State v. Brooks, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 1681 (La. App. 4 Cir Aug. 26, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Apparent authority, Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.