CA9: Intoxicated man freely consented to searches; actions show he knew what he was doing

Intoxicated man freely consented to searches. “Although Smith appeared intoxicated during the two searches, he had already begun cleaning the crime scene, gave his own version of the events, was able to answer the officer’s questions and sign the consent form without any difficulty, was alert, cooperative, and steady on his feet, had no trouble helping the officer lift a mattress, and did not appear to be confused at any point. Under these circumstances, the district court did not clearly err in determining that a reasonable officer would have viewed Smith’s consent as voluntary.” United States v. Smith, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17470 (9th Cir. Oct. 5, 2015).

Defendant doesn’t have standing to challenge a search of another person’s car bringing drugs to him. (The issue was analyzed as a reasonable expectation of privacy question.) United States v. Honeycutt, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136594 (W.D.La. Sept. 14, 2015),* adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136590 (W.D. La. Oct. 6, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.