Monthly Archives: November 2015

CA6: Def’s failure to submit to officer’s show of authority showed it was not a seizure

“The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing a firearm found in defendant Samuel Johnson’s car during a traffic stop. The district court ruled that because the police had unconstitutionally seized Johnson before he rolled through a stop sign, … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Def’s failure to submit to officer’s show of authority showed it was not a seizure

CA6 explains in detail informant hearsay in a close case

The informant hearsay shows probable cause for the search warrant. The court provides a detailed analysis of how informant hearsay is evaluated. On the totality of circumstances, probable cause was shown. United States v. Howard, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20705 … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA6 explains in detail informant hearsay in a close case

W.D.Tenn.: Guest in hotel room had reasonable expectation of privacy in room after renter left

Defendant was a guest in a hotel room, and the renter left. Defendant still had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the room. Defendant consented to the search of the room. “Moreover, the court finds Green’s testimony to be unbelievable … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Guest in hotel room had reasonable expectation of privacy in room after renter left

LA3: Typo in SW could be disregarded where the correct place was searched

The search warrant here used a form off a computer, and the officer forgot to put in the correct address, and the two were 2.69 miles apart. The officers went to the place they intended, not the place specified in … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Warrant execution, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on LA3: Typo in SW could be disregarded where the correct place was searched

IA: Use of siren and commands about where to stand during stop was a seizure

“Here, the evidence establishes that Officer Aljets exercised his authority to request Williams stop, rendering the encounter a seizure. The officer testified he ‘hit the siren horn’ which made a ‘whoop whoop’ sound in order to get Williams’s attention. The … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Use of siren and commands about where to stand during stop was a seizure

W.D.Mo.: Def volunteering he had a warrant justified extending stop; driver’s statement passenger hid a gun was RS

Defendant volunteered early in the stop that he had a warrant out for him, and that alone justified continuing the stop. The driver of the vehicle told the officer that defendant put a gun under the seat, and that justified … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Def volunteering he had a warrant justified extending stop; driver’s statement passenger hid a gun was RS

N.D.Ga.: SW for evidence of a robbery in a hotel room revealed evidence of identity theft, and it could be seized

In executing a search warrant for two hotel rooms for evidence of armed robbery occurring there, the officers encountered obvious evidence of identity theft in plain view, and it could be seized. “[W]hen they entered the room, he observed a … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: SW for evidence of a robbery in a hotel room revealed evidence of identity theft, and it could be seized

HI: Under state constitution, telling a motorist that if he doesn’t give a breath sample he’ll go to jail for 30 days is not voluntary consent

Under the Hawai’i Constitution’s protection of individual privacy, telling a motorist that if he doesn’t give a breath sample he’ll go to jail for 30 days is not voluntary consent. State v. Won, 2015 Haw. LEXIS 317 (Nov. 25, 2015) … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on HI: Under state constitution, telling a motorist that if he doesn’t give a breath sample he’ll go to jail for 30 days is not voluntary consent

CO: Collective knowledge doctrine applies to plain view seizure of laptop computer

The fellow officer (collective knowledge) rule applies to plain view seizure of a laptop computer that was seen in plain view that the fellow officer had probable cause to believe contained child pornography. People v. Swietlicki, 2015 CO 67, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Computer and cloud searches, Inventory | Comments Off on CO: Collective knowledge doctrine applies to plain view seizure of laptop computer

OH11: Smell of MJ coming from def’s person during traffic stop justifies search of person

Drifting over the center line was reasonable suspicion for a stop, and the smell of marijuana on the defendant’s person justified a search of the person. State v. Glenn, 2015-Ohio-4832, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4722 (11th Dist. Nov. 23, 2015). … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Smell of MJ coming from def’s person during traffic stop justifies search of person

GA: Def was detained and frisked for drugs, and view of text messages [pre-Riley] was reasonable based on drug dealing

Defendant first fled from police from a stop for driving with no headlights. The officer broke off the chase then went to the address the car was registered to and found it. Defendant was there with another, and he was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: Def was detained and frisked for drugs, and view of text messages [pre-Riley] was reasonable based on drug dealing

WaPo: Battling the modern American administrative state

WaPo: Battling the modern American administrative state by George Will: As the administrative state distorts the United States’ constitutional architecture, Clarence Thomas becomes America’s indispensable constitutionalist. Now in his 25th year on the Supreme Court, he is urging the judicial … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on WaPo: Battling the modern American administrative state

On the Media and the PATRIOT Act

On the Media: Surveillance Beyond the Patriot Act We all know the Patriot Act, but lesser-known programs like Executive Order 12333 account for the bulk of government surveillance–and receive even less oversight. The Patriot Act’s Unintended Consequences Ultimately, our assumption … Continue reading

Posted in National security | Comments Off on On the Media and the PATRIOT Act

WaPo: NSA’s bulk collection of Americans’ phone records to end

WaPo: NSA’s bulk collection of Americans’ phone records to end by Ellen Nakashima: The National Security Agency on Sunday will end its mass collection of data about Americans’ phone calls under the Patriot Act, 2½ years after a leak by … Continue reading

Posted in National security | Comments Off on WaPo: NSA’s bulk collection of Americans’ phone records to end

IL: Where statute on which seizure was based was later held unconstitutional, it is void ab initio; Krull and Davis not followed

In People v. Aguilar, 2013 IL 112116, 377 Ill. Dec. 405, 2 N.E.3d 321 (2013), the Illinois Supreme Court held facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment the state flat prohibition on possession of firearms outside the home. This defendant’s arrest … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on IL: Where statute on which seizure was based was later held unconstitutional, it is void ab initio; Krull and Davis not followed

CA8: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at defendant’s window was governed by Jardines

A dog sniff of defendant’s apartment window was a violation of Jardines. While the sniff was pre-Jardines, there was no clear binding authority that the government could rely on for Davis good faith to apply. United States v. Burston, 2015 … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA8: Pre-Jardines dog sniff at defendant’s window was governed by Jardines

PA: The best evidence rule does not apply to establishing probable cause

In establishing probable cause, the best evidence rule under Rule 1002 & 1004(a) did not apply to a still photograph of a truck that was taken from a security videotape that was erased and then taped over by a camera … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: The best evidence rule does not apply to establishing probable cause

WA: Def not entitled to suppression hearing where only disputed fact wasn’t material to any Fourth Amendment question

There was no right to a suppression hearing where the only disputed fact was irrelevant to any Fourth Amendment question. State v. Houston-Sconiers, 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 2915 (Nov. 24, 2015). Defendant was stopped because the officer knew from a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on WA: Def not entitled to suppression hearing where only disputed fact wasn’t material to any Fourth Amendment question

WI: Discarded cigarette butt is PC for a stop

Throwing a cigarette butt out a car window is littering, and an officer can make a stop even thought it’s a civil forfeiture offense. State v. Iverson, 2015 WI 101, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 709 (Nov. 25, 2015). An abrupt turn … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on WI: Discarded cigarette butt is PC for a stop

WaPo: Improper techniques, increased risks / Deaths have raised questions about the risk of excessive or improper deployment of Tasers

WaPo: Improper techniques, increased risks / Deaths have raised questions about the risk of excessive or improper deployment of Tasers by Cheryl W. Thompson & Mark Berman:

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: Improper techniques, increased risks / Deaths have raised questions about the risk of excessive or improper deployment of Tasers