Daily Archives: October 18, 2015

CA2: Def surprised at trial with unknown alleged consent search gets a post-trial evidentiary hearing on it

Defendant was surprised at trial with testimony that defendant’s wife had consented to a search of his computer prior to the search warrant issuing. Defendant moved for a mistrial. The FBI agent involved in that search was from Alabama and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on CA2: Def surprised at trial with unknown alleged consent search gets a post-trial evidentiary hearing on it

OH9: No standing in a package of drugs shipped to house in boyfriend’s name

A package containing cocaine was shipped to defendant’s house in the name of her boyfriend. She had no standing in the package because her name wasn’t on it. State v. Padilla, 2015-Ohio-4220, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4112 (9th Dist. Oct. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on OH9: No standing in a package of drugs shipped to house in boyfriend’s name

TX2: Passenger puking in car was not an exigent circumstance; she was not in danger

The fact defendant’s passenger had puked in the car was not an exigency requiring police action. There was no evidence she was a danger to herself or others. They were already near hospitals. Byram v. State, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TX2: Passenger puking in car was not an exigent circumstance; she was not in danger

FL3: Neighbor’s call of a broken back window brought police who suspected burglary; entry was justified

Defendant’s neighbor called the police because of a broken back window strongly suggesting a burglary. An officer arrived with a dog, and when no one answered, he sent in the dog. Following the dog, no people were found but the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: Neighbor’s call of a broken back window brought police who suspected burglary; entry was justified