Daily Archives: October 15, 2015

CA1: A search warrant presented to a magistrate may be modified before it issues; 4 yr delay in forensic analysis didn’t violate first warrant

A search warrant presented to a magistrate may be modified before it issues. [After all, isn’t that the quintessential “neutral and detached magistrate” providing truly independent review?] Here, electronics were seized, copied, and returned, and there was a four year … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA1: A search warrant presented to a magistrate may be modified before it issues; 4 yr delay in forensic analysis didn’t violate first warrant

WA: Violation of state rule that SW inventory be in presence of another officer requires suppression

Washington rules require that a search warrant inventory be done in the presence of another officer. In this case, the department had only five officers, and the search occurred during the night shift when only one officer was on duty. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WA: Violation of state rule that SW inventory be in presence of another officer requires suppression

WA: One who cohabitates with a probationer can object to search of shared bedroom

Defendant cohabitated with a probationer. He was present and objected to the search of their bedroom, which he had the right to do. What was found was inadmissible against him. State v. Rooney, 2015 Wash. App. LEXIS 2462 (Oct. 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on WA: One who cohabitates with a probationer can object to search of shared bedroom

N.D.N.Y.: Violation of Rule 41 in delay in searching cell phone doesn’t require suppression

The government obtained a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone and seized it promptly. The forensic search of the phone, however, didn’t occur for 85 days, after the 60 day window in the warrant. The defense, however, can show no … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Violation of Rule 41 in delay in searching cell phone doesn’t require suppression

TechDirt: Law Enforcement And The Ongoing Inconvenience Of The Fourth Amendment

TechDirt: Law Enforcement And The Ongoing Inconvenience Of The Fourth Amendment by Tim Cushing: The Fourth Amendment somehow still survives, despite the government’s best efforts to dismantle it… or at the very least, ignore it. Law enforcement agencies seemingly have … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TechDirt: Law Enforcement And The Ongoing Inconvenience Of The Fourth Amendment

D.Neb.: Google did not become a state actor by scanning email for child pornography and then reporting it to NCMEC

Google did not become a state actor by scanning email for child pornography and then reporting it to NCMEC. The IP address provided led to a search warrant. There was no Franks violation in not providing mobile IP addresses, too, … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Google did not become a state actor by scanning email for child pornography and then reporting it to NCMEC

MN: Criminalizing a motorist’s refusal to take a blood test under Minnesota’s statute fails strict scrutiny review

Criminalizing a motorist’s refusal to take a blood test under Minnesota’s statute fails strict scrutiny review. “We conclude that criminalizing the refusal to submit to a warrantless blood test ‘relates to the state’s ability to prosecute drunk drivers and keep … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on MN: Criminalizing a motorist’s refusal to take a blood test under Minnesota’s statute fails strict scrutiny review