Daily Archives: October 5, 2015

WaPo: Here’s a way the government can easily get your phone records without asking a judge

WaPo: Here’s a way the government can easily get your phone records without asking a judge by Jerry Markon: Administrative subpoenas are increasingly common, hard to fight and, some say, overly intrusive.

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on WaPo: Here’s a way the government can easily get your phone records without asking a judge

NYTimes: Supreme Court Prepares to Take On Politically Charged Cases

NYTimes: Supreme Court Prepares to Take On Politically Charged Cases By Adam Liptak: WASHINGTON — The last Supreme Court term ended with liberal victories, conservative disarray and bruised relations among the justices. The new one, which opens on Monday, marks … Continue reading

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYTimes: Supreme Court Prepares to Take On Politically Charged Cases

TN: Post-conviction petitioner bears burden of showing warrantless search was invalid; here, no witnesses to search called

Defendant on post-conviction did not prove that the motion to suppress an inventory would have been granted (and Tennessee law is favorable to the defense). All he called as witnesses were the lawyers involved and himself, but that does not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on TN: Post-conviction petitioner bears burden of showing warrantless search was invalid; here, no witnesses to search called

LA: Trial counsel not ineffective for not moving to suppress search that was clearly based on exigency

Trial counsel was not ineffective for not pursuing an exigency-based search issue where police entered after hearing cries for help when the grandfather of missing children entered and found blood on the floor. A suppression motion would have lost. State … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on LA: Trial counsel not ineffective for not moving to suppress search that was clearly based on exigency

CA5: Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights

Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights, particularly when the suppression hearing transcript wasn’t provided to the federal court. Cleveland … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: Suppression of evidence in state court does not per se raise a basis for a claim in federal court on whether the officers violated clearly established rights

OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

To justify the automobile exception in Oregon, the vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime. If parked, a warrant must be sought. State v. Belander, 274 Ore. App. 167, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1175 (September … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OR automobile exception requires vehicle must be mobile when first encountered in connection with a crime

W.D.Va.: VA statute that permitted natural gas companies to survey open fields doesn’t violate Fourth Amendment

Virginia statute that permitted natural gas transmission companies to enter open fields for survey purposes did not facially violate the Fourth Amendment or Virginia Constitution. Charlottesville Div. v. Dominion Transmission, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132554 (W.D.Va. September 30, 2015). 2255 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Open fields | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: VA statute that permitted natural gas companies to survey open fields doesn’t violate Fourth Amendment

D.Conn.: Police entry into public bar area clearly within Fourth Amendment; customers have no right to have sex in public

The Fourth Amendment claim that police entered the bar area of the plaintiff’s business because of police calls fails because it was open to the public. The selective enforcement claim fails on the facts. There is no First Amendment right … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Police entry into public bar area clearly within Fourth Amendment; customers have no right to have sex in public

W.D.Pa.: 1-2 yr old info coupled with current info showed ongoing drug operation at house

Information that was 1-2 years old was included in the affidavit, and there was current information, too. The old information supported showing that defendant’s counterfeiting operation was “protracted and continuous and that it was ongoing just two days to two … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Inventory, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: 1-2 yr old info coupled with current info showed ongoing drug operation at house