Daily Archives: October 17, 2015

OH9: If the drug dog gets there before the paperwork is done, the sniff is fine

Defendant’s stop for a lane change violation was valid. A drug dog officer arrived before the paperwork was processed, so the stop was not continued for that. [So, as long as the drug dog arrives promptly, a dog sniff of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on OH9: If the drug dog gets there before the paperwork is done, the sniff is fine

Wired: Report: Feds Will Require All Drones to Be Registered

Wired: Report: Feds Will Require All Drones to Be Registered by Michael Calore: We should expect the new regulations to be made public Monday, the report says. This will enable the new rules to be put into place before the … Continue reading

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on Wired: Report: Feds Will Require All Drones to Be Registered

AP (via AOL): Florida woman streamed live video of drunken driving

AP (via AOL): Florida woman streamed live video of drunken driving: Authorities say 911 calls from concerned viewers led to the arrest of a Florida woman who was streaming live video of herself while driving drunk. Lakeland police report 23-year-old … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AP (via AOL): Florida woman streamed live video of drunken driving

CA10: Officers get qualified immunity for SW that was not completely without particularity

In this § 1983 case over the particularity of a search warrant over stolen cars on his property, the officers had qualified immunity. The warrant was not so lacking in particularity that a reasonable officer couldn’t rely on it. Rathbun … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity | Comments Off on CA10: Officers get qualified immunity for SW that was not completely without particularity

OR: Opening garage door when defendant didn’t answer knock and said “hide that” was unreasonable

Police came to defendant’s house with state DHS and found the garage door open 8-18″. The officer called out for defendant to open the garage door, and he didn’t respond. From inside, they heard him say “hide that.” Then the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OR: Opening garage door when defendant didn’t answer knock and said “hide that” was unreasonable

C.D.Ill.: Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search

Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search. United States v. Sidwell, 440 F.3d 865, 869 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. Garcia, 983 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Before and after a CI does a controlled buy, there is no constitutional requirement that the CI be subjected to a body cavity search