Archives
-
Recent Posts
- LA4: Merely having a concealed firearm isn’t RS for a frisk
- OR: Merely driving off the road wasn’t RS, but adding the driver’s demeanor at the time was
- OH6: Trial court’s failure to explain RS under Rodriguez required remand
- CA6: Asking def before a patdown during arrest what he had on him wasn’t barred by Miranda
- NY Queens: PC shown for SW blood drawn at hospital after car wreck
-
-
ABA Journal Web 100, Best Law Blogs (2017); ABA Journal Blawg 100 (2015-16) (discontinued 2018)
-
by John Wesley Hall
Criminal Defense Lawyer and
Search and seizure law consultant
Little Rock, Arkansas
Contact: forhall @ aol.com / The Book
www.johnwesleyhall.com -
© 2003-24,
online since Feb. 24, 2003 Approx. 425,000 visits (non-robot) since 2012 Approx. 45,000 posts since 2003 (26,730+ on WordPress as of 12/31/23) -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fourth Amendment cases,
citations, and links -
Latest Slip Opinions:
U.S. Supreme Court (Home)
Federal Appellate Courts Opinions
First Circuit
Second Circuit
Third Circuit
Fourth Circuit
Fifth Circuit
Sixth Circuit
Seventh Circuit
Eighth Circuit
Ninth Circuit
Tenth Circuit
Eleventh Circuit
D.C. Circuit
Federal Circuit
Foreign Intell.Surv.Ct.
FDsys, many district courts, other federal courts
Military Courts: C.A.A.F., Army, AF, N-M, CG, SF
State courts (and some USDC opinions)
Google Scholar
Advanced Google Scholar
Google search tips
LexisWeb
LII State Appellate Courts
LexisONE free caselaw
Findlaw Free Opinions
To search Search and Seizure on Lexis.com $ -
Research Links:
Supreme Court:
SCOTUSBlog
S. Ct. Docket
Solicitor General's site
SCOTUSreport
Briefs online (but no amicus briefs)
Oyez Project (NWU)
"On the Docket"–Medill
S.Ct. Monitor: Law.com
S.Ct. Com't'ry: Law.com
-
General (many free):
LexisWeb
Google Scholar | Google
LexisOne Legal Website Directory
Crimelynx
Lexis.com $
Lexis.com (criminal law/ 4th Amd) $
Findlaw.com
Findlaw.com (4th Amd)
Westlaw.com $
F.R.Crim.P. 41
www.fd.org
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Resources
FBI Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (2008) (pdf)
DEA Agents Manual (2002) (download)
DOJ Computer Search Manual (2009) (pdf)
Stringrays (ACLU No. Cal.) (pdf)
-
Congressional Research Service:
--Electronic Communications Privacy Act (2012)
--Overview of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (2012)
--Outline of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (2012)
--Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping (2012)
--Federal Laws Relating to Cybersecurity: Discussion of Proposed Revisions (2012)
ACLU on privacy
Privacy Foundation
Electronic Frontier Foundation
NACDL’s Domestic Drone Information Center
Electronic Privacy Information Center
Criminal Appeal (post-conviction) (9th Cir.)
Section 1983 Blog -
"If it was easy, everybody would be doing it. It isn't, and they don't."
—Me -
"Life is not a matter of holding good cards, but of playing a poor hand well."
–Josh Billings (pseudonym of Henry Wheeler Shaw), Josh Billings on Ice, and Other Things (1868) (erroneously attributed to Robert Louis Stevenson, among others) -
“I am still learning.”
—Domenico Giuntalodi (but misattributed to Michelangelo Buonarroti (common phrase throughout 1500's)). -
"Love work; hate mastery over others; and avoid intimacy with the government."
—Shemaya, in the Thalmud -
"It is a pleasant world we live in, sir, a very pleasant world. There are bad people in it, Mr. Richard, but if there were no bad people, there would be no good lawyers."
—Charles Dickens, “The Old Curiosity Shop ... With a Frontispiece. From a Painting by Geo. Cattermole, Etc.” 255 (1848) -
"A system of law that not only makes certain conduct criminal, but also lays down rules for the conduct of the authorities, often becomes complex in its application to individual cases, and will from time to time produce imperfect results, especially if one's attention is confined to the particular case at bar. Some criminals do go free because of the necessity of keeping government and its servants in their place. That is one of the costs of having and enforcing a Bill of Rights. This country is built on the assumption that the cost is worth paying, and that in the long run we are all both freer and safer if the Constitution is strictly enforced."
—Williams v. Nix, 700 F. 2d 1164, 1173 (8th Cir. 1983) (Richard Sheppard Arnold, J.), rev'd Nix v. Williams, 467 US. 431 (1984). -
"The criminal goes free, if he must, but it is the law that sets him free. Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
—Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 659 (1961). -
"Any costs the exclusionary rule are costs imposed directly by the Fourth Amendment."
—Yale Kamisar, 86 Mich.L.Rev. 1, 36 n. 151 (1987). -
"There have been powerful hydraulic pressures throughout our history that bear heavily on the Court to water down constitutional guarantees and give the police the upper hand. That hydraulic pressure has probably never been greater than it is today."
— Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 39 (1968) (Douglas, J., dissenting). -
"The great end, for which men entered into society, was to secure their property."
—Entick v. Carrington, 19 How.St.Tr. 1029, 1066, 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (C.P. 1765) -
"It is a fair summary of history to say that the safeguards of liberty have frequently been forged in controversies involving not very nice people. And so, while we are concerned here with a shabby defrauder, we must deal with his case in the context of what are really the great themes expressed by the Fourth Amendment."
—United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56, 69 (1950) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting) -
"The course of true law pertaining to searches and seizures, as enunciated here, has not–to put it mildly–run smooth."
—Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610, 618 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., concurring). -
"A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable."
—Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 325 (1987) -
"For the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. ... But what he seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected."
—Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967) -
“Experience should teach us to be most on guard to protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
—United States v. Olmstead, 277 U.S. 438, 479 (1925) (Brandeis, J., dissenting) -
“Liberty—the freedom from unwarranted intrusion by government—is as easily lost through insistent nibbles by government officials who seek to do their jobs too well as by those whose purpose it is to oppress; the piranha can be as deadly as the shark.”
—United States v. $124,570, 873 F.2d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir. 1989) -
"You can't always get what you want / But if you try sometimes / You just might find / You get what you need."
—Mick Jagger & Keith Richards -
"In Germany, they first came for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Catholic. Then they came for me–and by that time there was nobody left to speak up."
—Martin Niemöller (1945) [he served seven years in a concentration camp] -
“You know, most men would get discouraged by now. Fortunately for you, I am not most men!”
---Pepé Le Pew "The point of the Fourth Amendment, which often is not grasped by zealous officers, is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which reasonable men draw from evidence. Its protection consists in requiring that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime."
—Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 13-14 (1948)
Website design by Wally Waller, Little Rock 
Monthly Archives: September 2015
WaPo: The Fourth Amendment shuffle
WaPo: The Fourth Amendment shuffle by Radley Balko: New Jersey was one of the last states to require police to obtain a warrant before searching your vehicle during a traffic stop. No more. The state’s highest court has ruled that … Continue reading
Ars Technica: Feds say your hard drives are for the government’s keeping
Ars Technica: Feds say your hard drives are for the government’s keeping by David Kravets: The Justice Department is set to argue Wednesday before a federal appeals court that it may prosecute people for crimes based on evidence obtained from … Continue reading
The Hill: Senators push feds to get warrants for cellphone spying
The Hill: Senators push feds to get warrants for cellphone spying by Julian Hattem: The bipartisan leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee want to expand the government’s commitment to obtaining a warrant before using controversial spying devices that pick up … Continue reading
ABAJ: Chemerinsky: 10 lessons from Chief Justice Roberts’ first 10 years
ABAJ: Chemerinsky: 10 lessons from Chief Justice Roberts’ first 10 years by Erwin Chemerinsky: 5. The Roberts Court has had a mixed record on criminal procedure in its most important cases, often ruling for the government, but sometimes for criminal … Continue reading
Vocativ: Police In These 22 States Can Trick Your Cell Phone
Vocativ: Police In These 22 States Can Trick Your Cell Phone by Brian Patrick Byrne: Stingray purchases are so shrouded in secrecy that they’re probably used a lot more than we know When police turn to technology to catch a … Continue reading
PA: Knock-and-announce rule in PA exists by court rule, and it serves important interests; the remedy for violation is suppression of evidence; Hudson not followed
The knock-and-announce rule in Pennsylvania exists by court rule, and it serves important interests. The remedy for violation is suppression of evidence. Pennsylvania does not follow Hudson v. Michigan. Commonwealth v. Frederick, 2015 PA Super 206, 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading
AR: Community caretaking function justified opening car door of driver asleep in a parking lot at 4:30 am with engine running
Defendant was found in a parking lot at 4:30 am with his lights on and engine running, but asleep. Opening the door was within the community caretaking function. Szabo v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 512, 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 591 … Continue reading
D.S.D.: Def showed that CI had material information for suppression hearing; disclosure of identity ordered
This CI’s identity was shown to be material for the suppression motion because of his alleged motive to lie. Moreover, the government does not specify that the CI will or will not be called as a witness at trial. The … Continue reading
MA already held 6 hrs CSLI needs no warrant; here it was two weeks worth but only 6 hrs used at trial, so warrant required
The Massachusetts court had already held that six hours of CSLI did not need a warrant. Here, however, two weeks’ worth were sought by subpoena, and the state sought to admit only six hours worth to comply with the prior … Continue reading
CA9: Warrantless jail rectal search that was painful and bloody should have been suppressed
On petition for rehearing from United States v. Fowlkes, 770 F.3d 748 (9th Cir. August 25, 2014) (prior post here), the panel concludes (2-1) that drug evidence obtained from a forced jail rectal search without a warrant that was painful … Continue reading
E.D.Ky.: SW application failed to show nexus to def’s house, and GFE can’t apply
This search warrant’s application failed to show nexus, even by inference. This is significant, and it makes it a “bare bones” affidavit not subject to the good faith exception. United States v. Spillman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128878 (E.D.Ky. September … Continue reading
E.D.Mich.: In parole searches, federal court’s duty is to determine if state law complied with
The Michigan parole search regulation has been sustained in the Sixth Circuit, and it requires reasonable suspicion. The court’s duty is to determine whether the regulation was complied with by reasonable suspicion, and it was. United States v. Brown, 2015 … Continue reading
IL: A forced chemical test of the blood two days after an accident was after the reduced REP of a driver had lapsed
A chemical test of appellant’s blood violated the Fourth Amendment because the police sought a chemical test two days after the car accident when plaintiff no longer had a diminished expectation of privacy. McElwain v. Office of the Ill. Secy. … Continue reading
OH8: Stop wasn’t justified where the video didn’t support the officer’s testimony
Defendant’s stop wasn’t justified where the video didn’t support the officer’s testimony. City of Middleburg Heights v. Wojciechowski, 2015-Ohio-3879, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3758 (8th Dist. September 24, 2015). It was reasonable to stop defendant’s car on a shots fired … Continue reading
D.Idaho: Dog on scene in 6 minutes meant no “delay”
The dog arrived within six minutes and conducted a free air sniff around the vehicle, all within the time of the original stop so delay [Rodriguez] is not an issue. United States v. McNabb, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127020 (D.Idaho … Continue reading
D.Utah: Incorporation of affidavit into warrant made it complete
The application for the search warrant listed the statutes of offenses under investigation, but the search warrant did not. The warrant, however, incorporated the application, so the officers knew what they were searching for. “The search warrant here does not … Continue reading
TX11: College student has REP in dorm room
A college student has a reasonable expectation of privacy in her dorm room from an entry by the police. The fact the resident assistant could look in there wasn’t determinative. State v. Rodriguez, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 9972 (Tex. App. … Continue reading
SC: Abandoning cell phone at a crime scene is a waiver of REP, even if it’s password protected
Leaving a cell phone at the scene of a crime and making no effort to reclaim it is an abandonment. Even having a passcode on the phone doesn’t overcome abandonment, following People v. Daggs, 133 Cal. App. 4th 361, 34 … Continue reading