Daily Archives: October 2, 2015

Cert. grant: Utah v. Strieff: 4A violated by outstanding warrant found during illegal stop?

Utah v. Strieff — Question Presented: “Should evidence seized incident to a lawful arrest on an outstanding warrant be suppressed because the warrant was discovered during an investigatory stop later found to be unlawful?” Prior post from January: Under the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Cert. grant: Utah v. Strieff: 4A violated by outstanding warrant found during illegal stop?

Two on Davis good faith exception; one a 20 year old cold case

In a cold case rape and murder that came from retesting defendant’s DNA 20 years after the crime, a search incident that was valid in 1985 was now saved by Davis good faith. State v. Adams, 2015-Ohio-3954, 2015 Ohio LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on Two on Davis good faith exception; one a 20 year old cold case

Cal.1st: Probation condition to reveal all passwords to search phones and social media was overbroad

A juvenile’s probation conditions required that he and his family turn over all passwords to cell phones and social media sites. The condition is overbroad considering what probation seeks to accomplish (seeing if he has stolen iPhones), and it implicates … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Probation condition to reveal all passwords to search phones and social media was overbroad

D.N.J.: Plain view supported seizure of records outside scope of search warrant

In a Medicaid fraud document search warrant, some documents found were outside of the scope of the warrant, but they satisfied the plain view doctrine that their potential incriminating nature was immediately apparent and they were found in the course … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Plain view supported seizure of records outside scope of search warrant

W.D.Ark.: Warrantless DNA sample 16 days after arrest was unreasonable

Warrantless taking a DNA sample from an arrestee under state law but 16 days after his arrest violated the Fourth Amendment. If it was at the time of booking, it would have been reasonable. Nominal damages awarded. Lewis v. Brazell, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Warrantless DNA sample 16 days after arrest was unreasonable