Category Archives: Seizure

CA3: Federal court should abstain from entering state court red-flag proceeding

Federal court should abstain under Younger from a state red-flag law proceeding to remove firearms from the plaintiff. Greco v. Bruck, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 33660 (3d Cir. Nov. 12, 2021). Defendant’s being in an alley known for druggies and … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA3: Federal court should abstain from entering state court red-flag proceeding

MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

A court can take judicial notice that execution of a search warrant at 11 pm is not during daylight hours in Mississippi. Doe v. Doe, 2021 Miss. App. LEXIS 473 (Nov. 9, 2021) (only recognizing rule; this is not a … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nighttime search, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MS: Judicial notice proper that SW execution at 11 pm is not during daylight hours

CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

Merely asking for ID is not a seizure. “Officer Hotz’s conduct would not have communicated to a reasonable person that he could not leave. Officer Hotz was alone, she did not display a weapon, she did not touch the defendants, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA8: Merely asking for ID not a seizure

CA3: Merely being on bail isn’t a seizure without serious restrictions

An employment dispute devolved into plaintiff’s arrest for theft of email and a claim of official misconduct. She was acquitted and sued. “Unlike the Appellants in Black or Gallo, Lentz did not experience any significant pretrial restrictions such as extensive … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA3: Merely being on bail isn’t a seizure without serious restrictions

E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

Defendant was asked by the police for his ID. He gave it over and they noted it and gave it back. This was not a seizure. United States v. Stephenson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 206467 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 26, 2021).* Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Handing over DL on request for police look wasn’t a seizure

ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

Reasonable suspicion was required when the officer retained defendant’s driver’s license by taking it, leaving her presence, and giving it to another officer to run a license check. Defendant was thus detained because a reasonable person in her position would … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Inevitable discovery, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Officer taking DL and handing it to another officer to check was a seizure requiring RS; anonymous CI was not corroborated

CA5: Five day delay and rerouting of package for search was reasonable

United States Postal Inspection Service and Department of Homeland Security officers reasonably suspected the package coming to defendant contained contraband. There was difficulty locating the package in the “mail stream.” They finally got to it before delivery and had it … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Seizure | Comments Off on CA5: Five day delay and rerouting of package for search was reasonable

CA1: Stopping def’s vehicle by heading into it was a seizure, and here it was with PC

Defendant’s vehicle “containment” where police stopped him by coming front bumper to bumper was a seizure under Brower v. County of Inyo. He attempted to flee by backing into other police cars and a civilian’s car. The seizure was with … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Seizure, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA1: Stopping def’s vehicle by heading into it was a seizure, and here it was with PC

CA6: 4A does not apply to a growing tree; it is not an “effect”

The Fourth Amendment does not apply to a growing tree which is part of the real property. “But the Supreme Court has told us that real property is not an ‘effect’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Oliver v. … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: 4A does not apply to a growing tree; it is not an “effect”

CNS: High court hears debate over civil rights claims for dismissed charges

Courthouse News Service: High court hears debate over civil rights claims for dismissed charges by Alexandra Jones (“In a case lodged by a father who says he was wrongly accused of sexually abusing his infant daughter, the Supreme Court heard … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CNS: High court hears debate over civil rights claims for dismissed charges

D.N.J.: Generalized “street tip” about defendant wasn’t RS

The street tip officers got was transmitted now third hand to the stopping officer. The tips were unremarkable about their credibility and weight. The court finds no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop. United States v. Joyner, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Generalized “street tip” about defendant wasn’t RS

OH12: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to violations of statute unless it also violates 4A

A statutory violation is not subject to suppression unless it also shows a violation of the Constitution. “Suppression is a remedy only for a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which in turn, only requires that a search and seizure be … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Seizure | Comments Off on OH12: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to violations of statute unless it also violates 4A

CA1: Collective knowledge isn’t required of all officers, just those involved

Collective knowledge is not required of all the officers involved in the case, just the one with knowledge telling the one making the stop. Here there was reasonable suspicion for the stop. United States v. Cruz-Rivera, 19-1465 & 19-1509 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA1: Collective knowledge isn’t required of all officers, just those involved

AL: Suspicious noises inside from knock-and-talk was exigency

Police knock and talk led to them hearing noises of someone rushing around inside. They could also smell marijuana from outside, and they had information of buys from inside the house. Exigency established. Hall v. State, CR-20-0394 (Ala. Crim. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Seizure | Comments Off on AL: Suspicious noises inside from knock-and-talk was exigency

DC: Grabbing one’s waistband while running from the police signals contraband, despite possible innocent explanations

Grabbing at one’s waistband while running from the police may have innocent explanations, too, but it signals contraband. Newman v. United States, 7-CF-520 (D.C. Sept. 2, 2021). A delay between the traffic stop and an ultimate search is not per … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on DC: Grabbing one’s waistband while running from the police signals contraband, despite possible innocent explanations

E.D.N.Y.: Def already lawfully arrested suffered no separate 4A violation by being taken to ATF, too

Defendant already lawfully arrested wasn’t unreasonably seized by also taking him to ATF for further questioning. United States v. Rodriguez, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158008 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2021). The affidavit showed “ample probable cause” and the Franks challenge is … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def already lawfully arrested suffered no separate 4A violation by being taken to ATF, too

CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

Property lawfully seized by the city is destroyed or sold after a short while if unclaimed. That doesn’t make it an unreasonable seizure or a taking. Conyers v. City of Chicago, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24676 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Seizure | Comments Off on CA7: Destruction or sale of seized property wasn’t unreasonable or a taking

CA8: Handcuffing for two minutes was not an unreasonable seizure when based on furtive movements

Plaintiffs’ handcuffing for two minutes because of furtive movements was reasonable. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the investigative detention did not become an arrest here because Officer Marzolf only used handcuffs briefly (under two minutes) … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Handcuffing for two minutes was not an unreasonable seizure when based on furtive movements

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW showed home was base of DTO

The collection of information for probable cause for the warrant included a reasonable inference that defendant’s home was a base of operations for a drug trafficking operation, and this was nexus. United States v. Jackson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144185 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Affidavit for SW showed home was base of DTO