Category Archives: Consent

VA: Claim of exigency belied by 45 minute wait and then seeking telephonic SW

The officers’ claim they didn’t have time to get a search warrant before entering because the magistrate was 30 minutes away was belied by the fact that they waited 45 minutes and then got a telephone authorization to search after … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on VA: Claim of exigency belied by 45 minute wait and then seeking telephonic SW

M.D.Pa.: Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist

Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist. Some of the translations here were non-sensical. Alternatively, however, the search was valid under the automobile exception. United States v. Ramirez-Mendoza, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Google Translate is not constitutionally sufficient to attempt to get consent from a non-English speaking motorist

CA8: Running a false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create QI

Running an allegedly false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create qualified immunity for the affidavit. Wheeler v. City of Searcy, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 29364 (8th Cir. Sept. 29, 2021). The New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency (“DCPP”) … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Private search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Running a false affidavit through the prosecutor doesn’t create QI

TX5: Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing

Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing. Schulz v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 7748 (Tex. App. – Dallas Sept. 21, 2021). “Citizens have long-cherished constitutional rights which deserve our protection. Law enforcement officers have difficult … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on TX5: Consent to a blood draw is also consent to its testing

NE: Continuing stop past end of mission of stop was without consent

Once the mission of the traffic stop should have ended, the officer continued questioning and sought consent. The consent was not voluntary. State v. Thompson, 30 Neb. App. 135, 2021 Neb. App. LEXIS 223 (Sept. 14, 2021). Touching the hood … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on NE: Continuing stop past end of mission of stop was without consent

NE: Consent during unreasonable extension of stop not voluntary

The traffic stop was reasonable, but it was unreasonably extended. Defendant’s consent during that period was not attenuated. State v. Thompson, 30 Neb.App. 135 (Sept. 14, 2021):

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NE: Consent during unreasonable extension of stop not voluntary

OH2: Old arrest for weapons charge made patdown after jaywalking stop in high crime area reasonable

Jaywalking stop in a high crime drug area led to officers finding about years’ old prior arrest for weapons. It was not unreasonable to pat defendant down. There admittedly was no other suggestion of criminality. State v. Allen, 2021-Ohio-3047 (2d … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Old arrest for weapons charge made patdown after jaywalking stop in high crime area reasonable

MO: SW for cell phone at def’s house wasn’t properly executed on his phone at police station

This cell phone search warrant was for a black Samsung in a black case at defendant’s address. It was executed at the police department, not defendant’s house. The trial court properly suppressed and properly held the good faith exception did … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MO: SW for cell phone at def’s house wasn’t properly executed on his phone at police station

ID: Where state constitution requires arrest warrant for completed misdemeanors, it was sufficient there was a reasonable belief officer was arresting for a completed felony

While an officer cannot arrest for a completed misdemeanor without an arrest warrant under the state constitution, the officer reasonably believed here that it could be a felony. SCOTUS’s recent opinion on the community caretaking function in Caniglia v. Strom … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Custody | Comments Off on ID: Where state constitution requires arrest warrant for completed misdemeanors, it was sufficient there was a reasonable belief officer was arresting for a completed felony

D.N.J.: Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo

The affidavit for search warrant was based on probable cause. Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo. United States v. Harper, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162543 (D.N.J. Aug. 26, 2021). Defendant was stopped with reasonable suspicion, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Review in a motion to suppress is not de novo

CA11: There was justification for ptf’s stop, so pretext question doesn’t get to jury

“The plaintiffs contend that the record contains evidence that could lead a jury to conclude that Officer Benton merely used the tag violation as a pretext for an otherwise unlawful stop. But Officer Benton’s subjective purpose for conducting the traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Pretext, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: There was justification for ptf’s stop, so pretext question doesn’t get to jury

M.D.La.: Evidentiary objection to product of search isn’t addressed in a suppression motion

Defendant’s argument is really an evidentiary objection, not a ground to suppress. Suppression is denied. United States v. Sterling, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160728 (M.D.La. Aug. 24, 2021). “Here, the credited testimony of all three officers is that Deputy Lowe … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Evidentiary objection to product of search isn’t addressed in a suppression motion

D.Nev.: Use of cell site simulator to track another’s phone leading to def was reasonable

The government’s use of a cell site simulator to track another person’s cell phone didn’t infringe on defendant’s rights. United States v. Goldsby, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160651 (D.Nev. Aug. 25, 2021). The court order (six years pre-Carpenter) showed probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Cell site simulators, Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Use of cell site simulator to track another’s phone leading to def was reasonable

IL: State showed reasonable belief in common authority for consent

The state established reasonable belief in common authority of defendant’s wife over his micro-SD card where there was child pornography. To rebut the state’s consent case, defendant would have to show that she actually had limited authority over the card, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: State showed reasonable belief in common authority for consent

D.N.J.: Dashcam showed no RS for traffic stop

The court having reviewed the dashcam, the officer lacked reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. The government’s alternative argument that there was generalized reasonable suspicion of drug dealing isn’t timely. On the merits, it still is inadequate. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Dashcam showed no RS for traffic stop

OH1: Telling def to keep his hands out of his pockets and then put them on hood when he wouldn’t didn’t taint later consent

During a stop, defendant was told to keep his hands out of his pockets, but he didn’t and he was fidgeting and putting his hands in and out. Telling him to put his hands on the hood after all that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH1: Telling def to keep his hands out of his pockets and then put them on hood when he wouldn’t didn’t taint later consent

TX9: Court clerk can swear officer for SW application

The affidavit for search warrant does not have to be sworn to before the issuing magistrate under Texas law. A clerk will do. Fender v. State, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 6605 (Tex. App. – Beaumont Aug. 9, 2021). No reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX9: Court clerk can swear officer for SW application

D.Conn.: Not reasonable here to handcuff plaintiff for presenting handgun permit during traffic stop

Handcuffing plaintiff for presenting his handgun permit when stopped wasn’t reasonable. “Because, on the record read in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, no reasonable police officer could have believed he or she had probable cause to arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Not reasonable here to handcuff plaintiff for presenting handgun permit during traffic stop

ND: Co-tenant’s bedroom couldn’t be subject to probation search

Co-tenant’s bedroom in probationer’s house was not a common area subject to a probation search. Failure to object at the time isn’t consent. State v. Cochran, 2021 ND 141, 2021 N.D. LEXIS 141 (Aug. 5, 2021). Consent to search the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on ND: Co-tenant’s bedroom couldn’t be subject to probation search

CO: Consent to officer’s entry extended to her briefly leaving and reentering

Defendant’s consent for an officer to enter extended to her reentry after leaving to retrieve a camera and then returning (even before getting it). People v. Stone, 2021 COA 104, 2021 Colo. App. LEXIS 1089 (Aug. 5, 2021). Even though … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CO: Consent to officer’s entry extended to her briefly leaving and reentering