GA: No IAC for not challenging complete cell phone download before search

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging a complete cell phone download as overbroad before the search because no binding case says it is. Lenon v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 250 (Aug. 13, 2026).

The question is not whether plaintiff was speeding. It’s whether there was probable cause to believe he was, and it was reasonable for the officer to think that. Henderson v. Vill. of New Holland, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23845 (6th Cir. Aug. 7, 2026).*

“Although the street was residential and turning on hazard lights may be an innocent act, based on the proximity to the border, characteristics of the area, Agent Egbert’s knowledge of previous unlawful border crossings in the area, and the known border crossing just north of the white Mercedes parked location, he had reasonable suspicion to conduct the investigatory stop. Because reasonable suspicion existed, no unlawful seizure occurred and thus the fhiit of the seizure need not be suppressed.” United States v. Lin, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181512 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 13, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, immigration stops, Overbreadth, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.