NY2: Justified search for mj didn’t justify looking at credit cards for forgery

The officer here could open a zippered pouch looking for marijuana, but he could not look at the credit cards inside to see if they were fraudulent. “On this record, Officer Zaleski’s discovery of three credit cards stacked inside a small zippered wallet was insufficient, without more, to justify an additional search that went beyond the search for marihuana.” People v. Mosquito, 2021 NY Slip Op 04620, 2021 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4698 (2d Dept. Aug. 4, 2021).

The court credits the government’s testimony that defendant consented despite a partially muffled audio which was still enough to see his demeanor and hear his tone of voice. United States v. Terrazas, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144948 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 3, 2021).*

The CI’s information was corroborated enough to make it reasonable suspicion. Then the dog sniff was valid. United States v. Abbeduto, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144920 (W.D.Ky. Aug. 3, 2021).*

The smell of marijuana during a traffic stop was reasonable suspicion for extending it. State v. Edwards, 2021 Iowa App. LEXIS 638 (Aug. 4, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.