Daily Archives: August 13, 2026

S.D.N.Y.: Project Veritas SW unsealed with limited redactions

One of the Project Veritas search warrant affidavits is partially redacted for privacy of some people and ordered filed. Redactions must be limited. In re Search Warrant Dated Nov. 5, 2021, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179075 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2026):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Project Veritas SW unsealed with limited redactions

D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

This search warrant for a firearm wasn’t stale because firearms are kept. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Cherry, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178900 (D. Ariz. Aug. 11, 2026).* Defendant’s failure to file a post-trial … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Burden of pleading, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: SW for firearm didn’t go stale

VA: Reverse keyword search warrant to Google decided on GFE but not merits

Reverse keyword search warrant to Google connected defendant to this crime. It’s not like geofence warrants in Chatrie, but the merits aren’t decided because the good faith exception applies in any event. Clements v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 428 … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on VA: Reverse keyword search warrant to Google decided on GFE but not merits

N.D.Ohio: Two dog sniffs didn’t provide PC for vehicle search

The first dog sniff didn’t provide probable cause, but it did provide reasonable suspicion to continue the stop longer. Then a second sniff didn’t either. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Copeland, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178749 (N.D. Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Two dog sniffs didn’t provide PC for vehicle search