Author Archives: Hall

S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

“The Fourth Amendment is implicated when medical examinations are undertaken at the initiative of a state official for an investigatory purpose. See Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 606 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that the Fourth Amendment applies to ‘searches … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

OH5: Ohio recognizes Groh incorporation by reference for particularity

Ohio recognizes Groh incorporation by reference for particularity. State v. Starcher, 2026-Ohio-15, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 11 (5th Dist. Jan. 6, 2026). In a civil case, the reference to Fourth Amendment was a typo for Fourteenth. It will be considered … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity | Comments Off on OH5: Ohio recognizes Groh incorporation by reference for particularity

D.N.J.: Someone doesn’t have to be home to execute a SW

It isn’t a proper Fourth Amendment challenge for a warrant not to be executed because no one is home. Rodriguez-Ferreira v. Sweeney, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 560 (D.N.J. Jan. 5, 2026). Defense counsel objected to the search warrant twice on … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d), Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Someone doesn’t have to be home to execute a SW

WSJ: How Judges Are Using AI to Help Decide Your Legal Dispute

WSJ: How Judges Are Using AI to Help Decide Your Legal Dispute by Erin Mulvaney (“The technology is helping summarize legal filings, prepare for hearings and map out decisions”):

Posted in AI | Comments Off on WSJ: How Judges Are Using AI to Help Decide Your Legal Dispute

TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

Defense counsel didn’t object to the search warrant and application coming into evidence in the state’s case because it fit within the defense theory, despite being full of hearsay, assuming defendant would testify, as he said he would. Then he … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on TN: Not objecting to SW affidavit at trial here not IAC; it fit defense theory

D.Mass.: Five prior surveilled deliveries led to anticipatory warrant

Five packages from Puerto Rico arrived at defendant’s apartment building for fictitious tenants in 303 and 404. After they were left in the alcove, defendant was seen to remove them to his apartment, 901. The sixth package had a positive … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Five prior surveilled deliveries led to anticipatory warrant

CA7: 911 call about DV in progress in house was exigency for entry

“Here we conclude that, based on the undisputed facts, the officers had an objectively reasonable basis to believe that someone in Cannon’s home needed immediate aid and that there was a compelling need to enter without a warrant. The officers … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA7: 911 call about DV in progress in house was exigency for entry

WaPo: U.S. capture of Maduro may be illegal; that likely won’t matter in court

WaPo: U.S. capture of Maduro may be illegal; that likely won’t matter in court by Perry Steinand Shayna Jacobs:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: U.S. capture of Maduro may be illegal; that likely won’t matter in court

CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

The charge was impersonating an FBI agent at a school student pickup line. A warrant was issued for defendant’s house and computers to see if he bought faux FBI paraphernalia online.* The district court suppressed for lack of nexus. Reversed; … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA10: Nexus subject to GFE

MA: Facebook selfie supported SW for def’s cell phone

A Facebook photo that appeared to be a selfie on defendant’s Facebook account wearing the shirt witnesses to the shooting describe supported a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone. Commonwealth v. Carleton, 2026 Mass. LEXIS 1 (Jan. 5, 2026). Plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones | Comments Off on MA: Facebook selfie supported SW for def’s cell phone

CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

A three-week-old controlled buy was part of the probable cause. The Fourth Amendment doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness. Nexus was clear: “The nexus in this case, by contrast, left nothing to the imagination.” Police used pole camera surveillance … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t impose a “shot clock” on staleness

D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

Petitioner obtained his search warrant application years after he was convicted. His habeas is denied. He claims it shows he was actually innocent, but this is only potential legal innocence, not actual innocence, and there’s a difference. Davis v. Warden, … Continue reading →

Posted in Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Late disclosed SW application doesn’t show “actual innocence”; “legal innocence” is different

KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

The drug dog arrived while the traffic tickets were still being written. All the record shows is that. The record doesn’t “reveal how much time elapsed between the canine’s arrival and it alerting to the odor of unlawful drugs emanating … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on KY: Def needs to make a record on how long the drug dog extended the stop under Rodriguez

WSJ: A Police Drone Might Be Behind Your Next Ticket

WSJ: A Police Drone Might Be Behind Your Next Ticket by James Fanelli (“Law enforcement is expanding the use of remotely controlled drones despite concerns of civil liberties groups”):

Posted in Drones | Comments Off on WSJ: A Police Drone Might Be Behind Your Next Ticket

W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

No clear line of cases suggests the officer’s searching inside plaintiff’s underwear was unreasonable where it was not seen by anyone else. “Plaintiff’s right to be free from such a search was not clearly established at that time and Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Strip search | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Not clearly established that searching inside underwear on side of road was unreasonable if no one saw it

D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

The issuing magistrate is not shown to be an adjunct law enforcement officer just because the judge shares an address with a police department. Martinez v. Wilson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 268655 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2025). The search incident of … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Issuing magistrate sharing address with LE agency doesn’t make the magistrate not “neutral and detached”

M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

Child pornography probable cause allegations, especially those on a computer have a “long shelf life” and virtually never go stale. United States v. Picca, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 267611 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 30, 2025). Plaintiff alleged enough to proceed past … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

There was reasonable suspicion enough potential for dangerousness for a protective sweep of defendant’s car. “The district court’s dangerousness analysis relied on four factors: (1) Raban’s gang affiliation, (2) the high-crime and rival-gang neighborhood, (3) Armstrong’s presence, and (4) Raban’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

Kavanaugh Stops #4

Reason: Did Brett Kavanaugh Just Apologize for Butchering the Fourth Amendment? Maybe. by Damon Root (“Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice”):

Posted in immigration stops, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Kavanaugh Stops #4

Reason: DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship

Reason: DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship by C.J. Ciaramella*:

Posted in immigration stops | Comments Off on Reason: DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship