S.D.N.Y.: Investigative medical exams implicate 4A

“The Fourth Amendment is implicated when medical examinations are undertaken at the initiative of a state official for an investigatory purpose. See Tenenbaum v. Williams, 193 F.3d 581, 606 (2d Cir. 1999) (holding that the Fourth Amendment applies to ‘searches and seizures,’ including medical examinations, ‘made in the course of child abuse investigations’). Investigative medical examinations conducted without parental consent or judicial authorization violate the Constitution unless ‘reasonable or probable cause or exigent circumstances justifying an emergency examination’ existed at the time the examination was performed.” McInnis v. City of N.Y., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 269192 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2025).

Defendant’s Franks claim is denied as conclusory and lacking any allegation of prejudice. United States v. Boyle, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 318 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 5, 2026).*

Crossing the fog line generally supports a stop in this circuit. United States v. Seakor, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 879 (D.S.D. Jan. 2, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.