Author Archives: Hall

OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

Affidavit for search warrant was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial. It was full of hearsay and the burden for probable cause is too low for reasonable doubt. Also, admitting a video violated the confrontation clause. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on OH8: Affidavit for SW was improperly admitted into evidence of guilt at trial

OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

Pole camera observation didn’t violate the Oregon Constitution. State v. Lane, 347 Or. App. 229 (Feb. 19, 2026). Probable cause developed after the stop but before the search under the automobile exception. There was also consent. United States v. Camorlinga, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Pole cameras, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Pole camera doesn’t violate state constitution

M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

A search warrant return outside the state law time limit by law is not a Franks issue. United States v. Davis, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33100 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 18, 2026). Plaintiff “fails to specifically address, and thus waives any … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: SW return filed outside state law time limit isn’t a Franks issue

C.D.Cal.: Suit over seizure of guns on mental health order dismissed

Officers had a court order under Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 8100 for taking plaintiff’s guns because of a mental health hold. They came to his house but he was gone. They talked to him through his Ring doorbell. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Suit over seizure of guns on mental health order dismissed

Reason: Was It a Coincidental Traffic Stop or AI-Powered Surveillance?

Reason: Was It a Coincidental Traffic Stop or AI-Powered Surveillance? by Mattha Busby (“Seth Ferranti was driving his Ford pickup on a southeastern Nebraska stretch of the interstate in November 2024 when law enforcement pulled him over, claiming that he … Continue reading →

Posted in AI | Comments Off on Reason: Was It a Coincidental Traffic Stop or AI-Powered Surveillance?

NPR: Some cities are ditching license plate readers over immigration surveillance concerns

NPR: Some cities are ditching license plate readers over immigration surveillance concerns by Jude Joffe-Block (“The use of automatic license plate readers has exploded across the country in recent years. The cameras on roads and freeways that take images of … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on NPR: Some cities are ditching license plate readers over immigration surveillance concerns

E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

It’s not constitutionally required to show that a cell phone was actually used in a crime for probable cause to search it. It’s enough that it likely could have. “A law enforcement-affiant’s personal expertise combined with attestation to a defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: It’s not actually required a cell phone be involved in a crime; it’s whether it is likely it was

TN: No standing in someone else’s curtilage

Defendant pulled his car into a convenient driveway for his stop, but he had no standing in the curtilage because it wasn’t his place. The car he had standing in, but this was a plain view. State v. Gunn, 2026 … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on TN: No standing in someone else’s curtilage

PA: RS not needed to seize firearm on car seat in plain view during traffic stop

The inherent dangers in a traffic stop justified the officer doing a protective sweep to seize a firearm on the seat in plain view, despite lack of any sense that defendant was going to use it. Commonwealth v. Hawkins-Davenport, 2026 … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: RS not needed to seize firearm on car seat in plain view during traffic stop

AR: Trial counsel’s comment motion to suppress ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel

A motion to suppress once made and denied doesn’t have to be renewed during the proof. Trial counsel’s statement that the ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel to raise it, but it loses on the merits anyway. Cobb v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Trial counsel’s comment motion to suppress ruling was correct didn’t bind appellate counsel

Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You.

Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You. by Frank Figliuzzi (FBI retired):

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on Lincoln Square: Hate ICE? Social Media Companies Will Snitch on You.

E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

“This case arises from an officer shooting the target of a search warrant. Detective Thomas Strode obtained a warrant to search Don Clark’s residence for illegal guns and drugs. As officers entered without knocking, Clark shot at the officers but … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Such is the risk of a no-knock warrant

IA approves residence indicia warrant

This was a search warrant for indicia of defendant’s residence. State v. Uranga, 2026 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 20 (Feb. 13, 2026) (§ 56.18 n.2). Defendant was tried in 2012 and if his counsel had made a motion to suppress cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on IA approves residence indicia warrant

OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

Cleveland’s city elevator inspector got permission from the maintenance persons at three apartment buildings in Cleveland to conduct regular inspections. This was all by consent. The court thus does not have to decide whether the inspections were also valid as … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on OH8: Apt building maintenance workers consented to administrative elevator inspections

D.Conn.: Officers muting microphones to discuss extending stop helped show Rodriguez violation

The stop was justified, but the stop was unreasonably extended for the drug dog that didn’t alert. Then the officers muted their microphones for 40 seconds before a search of defendant’s person. “The officers’ choice to spend several minutes on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Officers muting microphones to discuss extending stop helped show Rodriguez violation

IN: Jamming to music or twitching from drugs?

So, was defendant’s jerking movement in his car at 8 am him “jamming” or “grooving” to music or under the influence of a stimulant drug? Not enough here for reasonable suspicion. This is but a hunch. Wilson v. State, 2026 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Jamming to music or twitching from drugs?

CA3: Second protective sweep was justified by noise inside

The premises had been subjected to a protective sweep seeing firearms, locked up, and a search warrant was sought. Officers heard a noise inside and came in and found defendant and he’d apparently moved one of the guns. The initial … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Second protective sweep was justified by noise inside

CNN: Fulton County accuses Justice Department of misleading the judge who approved elections office search warrant

CNN: Fulton County accuses Justice Department of misleading the judge who approved elections office search warrant by Tierney Sneed (“Officials in Fulton County, Georgia, accused the Justice Department of making “serious” omissions in the application the FBI filed to obtain … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CNN: Fulton County accuses Justice Department of misleading the judge who approved elections office search warrant

D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

The search of defendant’s car was unreasonable under the automobile exception because there was no probable cause to believe drugs or other evidence would be found there. Also, the inventory was invalid. United States v. Lujan, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Automobile exception search fails for lack of PC

D.Vt.: SW for CP was specific enough to prevent a general search of devices

The warrant for CSAM was specific enough and didn’t permitt and unlimited search of the devices. “Although the language of the warrant issued here could have been drafted more artfully, the court finds the limiting language sufficiently connects the items … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Particularity | Comments Off on D.Vt.: SW for CP was specific enough to prevent a general search of devices