MO: State can waive requirement of written motion to suppress

While statute requires a written motion to suppress, the state can agree to it being oral, which happened here. Defendant loses on the merits, however, for exigent circumstances. State v. Yates, 2025 Mo. App. LEXIS 839 (Dec. 9, 2025).

The wellness check of defendant sitting apparently passed out with the engine running not knowing where she was or was going was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Lewis, 2025 Mass. App. LEXIS 123 (Dec. 10, 2025).*

Defendant was lawfully stopped for traffic infractions, and the gun was seen in plain view when she was looking for her papers in the glove compartment. People v. Bishop, 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 9861 (Dec. 9, 2025).*

Defendant officer was entitled to qualified immunity for firing his gun into the decedent’s truck when he legitimately feared it would hit him escaping. Settle v. Collier, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32156 (11th Cir. Dec. 9, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Community caretaking function, Excessive force, Motion to suppress, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.