Author Archives: Hall

CA10: No Bivens remedy for false arrest and malicious prosecution

No Bivens remedy for false arrest and malicious prosecution. Even if wrong, there was qualified immunity here. Boudette v. Buffington, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24512 (10th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021). The citizen informant called police to say that there was … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA10: No Bivens remedy for false arrest and malicious prosecution

CA9: Interpol “Red Notice” of another country’s arrest warrant doesn’t satisfy the Fourth Amendment

An Interpol “Red Notice” of another country’s arrest warrant doesn’t satisfy the Fourth Amendment. (DoJ agrees.) Sura v. Garland, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24508 n.3 (9th Cir. Aug. 17, 2021):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA9: Interpol “Red Notice” of another country’s arrest warrant doesn’t satisfy the Fourth Amendment

NE: No REP in cell in pretrial detention for evidence of witness tampering; also, SW obtained

The state got a search warrant for a pretrial detainee’s county jail cell for evidence of witness tampering. The search was not institutional security. The trial court suppressed, but the court of appeals reversed: there is no reasonable expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NE: No REP in cell in pretrial detention for evidence of witness tampering; also, SW obtained

W.D.Pa.: Verizon voluntarily providing CSLI was not a 4A violation

Verizon voluntarily providing CSLI when it found out a search warrant was coming was not a Fourth Amendment violation. [This would also be inevitable discovery.] United States v. Searcy, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153522 (W.D.Pa. Aug. 16, 2021). None of … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Verizon voluntarily providing CSLI was not a 4A violation

CA8: Handcuffing for two minutes was not an unreasonable seizure when based on furtive movements

Plaintiffs’ handcuffing for two minutes because of furtive movements was reasonable. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the investigative detention did not become an arrest here because Officer Marzolf only used handcuffs briefly (under two minutes) … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell site location information, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Handcuffing for two minutes was not an unreasonable seizure when based on furtive movements

CA8: Use of ketamine on agitated person leading to injury was reasonable

The use of ketamine on an intoxicated and suicidal person, and one in probable mental distress, too, was not excessive force, even though she was put into respiratory distress. Buckley v. Hennepin Cty., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24257 (8th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Use of ketamine on agitated person leading to injury was reasonable

CA2 en banc: Directions to a suspect don’t make a stop a search without a trespass or an intrusion into a REP

CA2 en banc, summary by the court (8-3): “This case presents what is, in some respects, a familiar question: whether a police officer’s pat-down search of a suspect for weapons was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Based on the facts … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA2 en banc: Directions to a suspect don’t make a stop a search without a trespass or an intrusion into a REP

D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

The New Mexico regulatory scheme for truck inspections has already been held to satisfy Burger. Stopping defendants’ truck for inspection at an inspection station was reasonable under that standard. On opening the trailer to compare to the bills of lading, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Truck inspection stop valid admin search under Burger

N.D.Miss.: No exclusion for knock-and-announce violation

“Engram is simply incorrect that the exclusionary rule may apply when a no-knock warrant application fails to establish justification for a no-knock entry. See United States v. White, 990 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 2021) (‘Whether this affidavit sufficed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: No exclusion for knock-and-announce violation

CA7: Franks issue moot by other PC

A warrant wasn’t needed to seize a cell phone, but one was to search it, and they had one. Attacking the CI’s credibility fails as an issue, Franks or otherwise, because there is other probable cause for the warrant. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA7: Franks issue moot by other PC

CA4: Dog sniff before traffic ticket finished was reasonable

Dog sniff occurred here during the initial ordinary incidents of the traffic stop and writing a ticket so it didn’t extend the stop. United States v. Junkins, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 24174 (4th Cir. Aug. 13, 2021). Defendant’s vehicle was … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Dog sniff before traffic ticket finished was reasonable

CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

Moving a suspicious looking box from the FedEx conveyor belt to a back room for a dog sniff did not require reasonable suspicion nor did it deprive FedEx of custody of the box. The dog alert provided justification for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Mail and packages, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Taking box off FedEx conveyor belt for dog sniff didn’t deprive FedEx of custody

The Economist: A 38-year-old charity will be integrated into Apple’s newest operating system

The Economist: A 38-year-old charity will be integrated into Apple’s newest operating system (“The peculiar status of NCMEC, funded by the Justice department but independent of it, allows what might otherwise be an unlawful search”)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Economist: A 38-year-old charity will be integrated into Apple’s newest operating system

D.N.J.: Dashcam showed no RS for traffic stop

The court having reviewed the dashcam, the officer lacked reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop. The government’s alternative argument that there was generalized reasonable suspicion of drug dealing isn’t timely. On the merits, it still is inadequate. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Dashcam showed no RS for traffic stop

N.D.Ohio: Habeas claim SW fake was barred by Stone

Defendant litigated his motion to suppress before this 2255. His claim now that the warrants were fake is barred by Stone. Davison v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150386 (N.D.Ohio Aug. 9, 2021). The fact the CI may have … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Habeas claim SW fake was barred by Stone

He predicted today’s lack of digital privacy in 1994

WaPo: Surveillance and Capture: Two Models of Privacy by Reed Albergotti (“He predicted the dark side of the Internet 30 years ago. Why did no one listen? Philip Agre, a computer scientist turned humanities professor, was prescient about many of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on He predicted today’s lack of digital privacy in 1994

Three week trial starting 8/23

So postings will occur on the weekends.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Three week trial starting 8/23

OH1: Telling def to keep his hands out of his pockets and then put them on hood when he wouldn’t didn’t taint later consent

During a stop, defendant was told to keep his hands out of his pockets, but he didn’t and he was fidgeting and putting his hands in and out. Telling him to put his hands on the hood after all that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH1: Telling def to keep his hands out of his pockets and then put them on hood when he wouldn’t didn’t taint later consent

E.D.Cal.: DEA admin subpoena for prescription records enforced despite privacy interest

The DEA’s administrative subpoena for prescription records is enforced. While circuit law shows some privacy interest of persons named in the records, the DEA’s ability to get it overcomes that. United States v. Saxton, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150296 (E.D.Cal. … Continue reading →

Posted in Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: DEA admin subpoena for prescription records enforced despite privacy interest

N.D.Ohio: Picking up gun to check SN to run it was not a valid plain view

Picking up defendant’s firearm to see the serial number to check if it was stolen was a search, and it was without probable cause. Obviously, not all guns are stolen. After that, the officer determined that defendant was a felon … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Picking up gun to check SN to run it was not a valid plain view