N.D.Miss.: No exclusion for knock-and-announce violation

“Engram is simply incorrect that the exclusionary rule may apply when a no-knock warrant application fails to establish justification for a no-knock entry. See United States v. White, 990 F.3d 488, 493 (6th Cir. 2021) (‘Whether this affidavit sufficed to invoke the exception [for a no-knock warrant] is an open question. It will remain one. Even if the police violated the knock-and-announce rule, suppression is not the appropriate remedy.’); United States v. Rigaud, 684 F.3d 169, 176 (1st Cir. 2012) (challenge to support for no-knock application would not justify suppression under exclusionary rule).” United States v. Engram, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152807 (N.D.Miss. Aug. 13, 2021).

This entry was posted in Exclusionary rule, Knock and announce. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.