Author Archives: Hall

CA5: 1836 US-Morocco Treaty of Peace and Friendship as applied to courthouse metal detector not “clearly established law”

Plaintiffs are Moorish-Americans who, on the way to file papers with the clerk, refused to go through the metal detector at the Caddo Parish Courthouse. Entrance was denied. They refused to leave and were then arrested for trespass. They sued … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA5: 1836 US-Morocco Treaty of Peace and Friendship as applied to courthouse metal detector not “clearly established law”

MS: Using ladder to look over wall in rented storage unit wasn’t a “search” and did not violate any REP

Officers used a ladder to look over a ceilingless wall in a storage building into defendant’s leased unit. The observation led to a search warrant. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy from that look because anyone there could do … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on MS: Using ladder to look over wall in rented storage unit wasn’t a “search” and did not violate any REP

OR: Holding def’s ID for 30 minutes for no apparent reason was a seizure without RS

Retaining defendant’s ID for 30 minutes before even thinking about questioning his identity was a seizure without reasonable suspicion. State v. Orman, 322 Or. App. 707, 2022 Ore. App. LEXIS 1479 (Nov. 16, 2022). Defendant was not seized when he … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Holding def’s ID for 30 minutes for no apparent reason was a seizure without RS

S.D.W.Va.: Dispatch’s mistake of fact def’s vehicle was unregistered did not make stop unreasonable

Defendant challenged one basis for his stop, an inspection sticker. However, dispatch also said the vehicle was unregistered and that’s a valid reason. It turned out, however, it was validly registered. “It does not matter that Defendant’s vehicle was in … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Dispatch’s mistake of fact def’s vehicle was unregistered did not make stop unreasonable

N.D.Ind.: Franks hearing ordered over officer’s claim of smell of MJ

Defendant gets a Franks hearing even if to rebut the government’s claim the good faith exception applies. The affiant officer claimed there was an “overwhelming” smell of marijuana coming from defendant’s house as they approached for a knock-and-talk, which was … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Franks hearing ordered over officer’s claim of smell of MJ

E.D.Va.: Could have seen for plain view isn’t the same as actually seeing

Defendant did not abandon the vehicle he was driving with permission of the owner. When officers asked for consent he said it wasn’t his and it was his “baby mama’s” vehicle. Her permission gave him standing. The court disagrees with … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Could have seen for plain view isn’t the same as actually seeing

D.S.C.: Court is “troubled” by methods of search, but exclusion isn’t remedy

Defendant’s claim there wasn’t any search warrant and that he wasn’t shown one is rejected. He came out of the house with his hands up and empty, and an officer is shown on bodycam handing him a paper and him … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Court is “troubled” by methods of search, but exclusion isn’t remedy

FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

Defendant’s blurting out that he’d murdered someone caught on bodycam in the ER wasn’t subject to suppression under the state communications privacy law because there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the utterance. Reed v. State, 2022 Fla. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

D.Minn.: Govt fails on its burden of proving GFE applies; no witnesses called

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone lacked probable cause for lack of specificity. More importantly, the government failed in its burden of proof to show the good faith exception applies. United States v. Armstrong, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 207602 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Govt fails on its burden of proving GFE applies; no witnesses called

IL: Smell of burnt mj alone not RS

The smell of burnt cannabis without seeing more is not reasonable suspicion in Illinois. People v. Redmond, 2022 IL App (3d) 210524, 2022 Ill. App. LEXIS 479 (Nov. 15, 2022). On an Anders brief, the inventory search of defendant’s car … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Smell of burnt mj alone not RS

E.D.Ark.: Inmate states claim against Sheriff and jail phone provider that privileged attorney calls were turned over to police

Plaintiff Texas inmate was in an Arkansas county jail in 2015-17, and he discovered in 2021 through his current defense lawyer that the county jail phone contractor turned over telephone calls between him and his criminal defense lawyer to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Inmate states claim against Sheriff and jail phone provider that privileged attorney calls were turned over to police

techdirt: Immunity Denied To Deputies Who Tried To Turn Muscular Dystrophy Into Reasonable Suspicion

techdirt: Immunity Denied To Deputies Who Tried To Turn Muscular Dystrophy Into Reasonable Suspicion by Tim Cushing (reporting on Klaver v. Hamilton Cty., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 30642 (6th Cir. Nov. 3, 2022)*)

Posted in Qualified immunity | Comments Off on techdirt: Immunity Denied To Deputies Who Tried To Turn Muscular Dystrophy Into Reasonable Suspicion

D.R.I.: Church rectory was subject to a SW and it was treated as a single-family dwelling with separate bedrooms

A church rectory was the subject of a child pornography search warrant. Multiple people lived there, but there was no sign that it was a multi-family type dwelling: “A more detailed description of the building, however, is not provided. From … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Private search, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Church rectory was subject to a SW and it was treated as a single-family dwelling with separate bedrooms

WV: Juvenile “pick-up” order issued on PC was equivalent of warrant for Payton purposes for entry into mom’s home

Entry on a juvenile “pick-up” order here “was founded upon probable cause to believe that her ‘health, safety and welfare’ demanded it …. was the functional equivalent of an arrest warrant and was lawfully issued.” Therefore, the entry was valid … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Scope of search | Comments Off on WV: Juvenile “pick-up” order issued on PC was equivalent of warrant for Payton purposes for entry into mom’s home

WaPo: Google reaches record $392M privacy settlement over location data

WaPo: Google reaches record $392M privacy settlement over location data by Bryan Pietsch (“Google agreed to pay $391.5 million to 40 states to settle an investigation into its location tracking practices, a coalition of state attorneys general announced Monday. The … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on WaPo: Google reaches record $392M privacy settlement over location data

W.D.Ky.: Clerical error in filestamp of SW return not prejudicial error

Relying on a file mark stamp on a search warrant return that was a year and a few days earlier, defendant claims the issuing judge and officers conspired to back date everything to coverup an illegal search. That’s speculative. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Clerical error in filestamp of SW return not prejudicial error

D.Vt.: Def’s misidentification in original affidavit was later corrected and overall survives Franks challenge

There were omissions in the original affidavit for warrant about identification that were later cleared up in a subsequent affidavit for another. On the whole, probable cause remains no matter what. United States v. Mohamud, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205560 … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Vt.: Def’s misidentification in original affidavit was later corrected and overall survives Franks challenge

N.D.Ga.: Not IAC to not pursue unsettled 4A question

2255 petitioner doesn’t show ineffective assistance of counsel on counsel’s not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim on an unsettled question of law. That’s professional judgment. He has to show that the issue was clearly meritorious. Brito-Arroyo v. United States, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Not IAC to not pursue unsettled 4A question

AL: When def was being taken to ER for chest pains, looking in pocket of jacket he wanted to take and a pill bottle inside was reasonable

Complaining of chest pains, defendant called 911. Attached to his address was a “safety alert” that police should show up for the safety of EMTs and firemen. As he was being transported to the hospital, he asked for his coat … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on AL: When def was being taken to ER for chest pains, looking in pocket of jacket he wanted to take and a pill bottle inside was reasonable

M.D.Fla.: Cross-examining officer about mistakes in SW affidavit was mentioned in not finding IAC

All defense lawyers have likely done this: Cross-examining an officer over factual mistakes in the search warrant affidavit. This was mentioned in rejecting other parts of defense counsel’s representation at trial as not deficient under Strickland. Neiheisel v. United States, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Cross-examining officer about mistakes in SW affidavit was mentioned in not finding IAC