Author Archives: Hall

MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

When defendant’s backpack was abandoned, that included sealed packages inside it. State v. Fernandez, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 461 (June 27, 2023). “Nonetheless, the Durham Court’s general statement, that having a roommate does not convert a single-family house into a … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

NM: SW for bodily standards in case pending for trial not 4A or due process violation

After defendant was indicted a search warrant for bodily standards was sought from the metropolitan court. It didn’t lose jurisdiction for a search warrant, even in a case pending in a “higher” trial court. “[P]ost-indictment warrants are lawful in New … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NM: SW for bodily standards in case pending for trial not 4A or due process violation

CA6: Opening car door without warning exceeded community caretaking function

The police community caretaking function has a long and important history that goes back nearly 800 years. But, seeing defendant parked in the snow with the engine running and apparently asleep, opening his car door to check on him was … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Opening car door without warning exceeded community caretaking function

CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

Prison email to family members is protected by the First Amendment. “Just as the Fourth Amendment protects against searches by technology unknown in the 18th century, see Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27, 34-38 (2001), the First Amendment protects … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, E-mail, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

A bank employee saw a van parked on the bank’s lot that had been there overnight. Officers responded and saw an assault rifle in the passenger compartment. “Around 12:30 [p.m.], without knocking or announcing their presence, Lambert and Wagner pulled … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Search of unlocked van with door ajar left overnight on bank parking lot with visible assault rifle was reasonable under community caretaking function

W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

Law enforcement officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target. “However, in reviewing a search warrant for probable cause, a court is ‘to look holistically at what the affidavit does show, instead … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

CA11: Magistrate who came to the scene to sign SW was still neutral and detached

The issuing magistrate was still neutral and detached. He came to the location of the search to assist in getting the warrant issued, but he stayed away from the building and signed the paperwork. He did not get involved or … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on CA11: Magistrate who came to the scene to sign SW was still neutral and detached

NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

Where the officer smelled marijuana in the passenger compartment and searched for it finding nothing, a search of the engine compartment and trunk was excessive under the automobile exception. From the syllabus : “Expanding the search to the engine compartment … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of mj in the passenger compartment doesn’t justify search of trunk or engine compartment

E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

Failure to file the warrant return doesn’t require suppression. It’s a curable ministerial act. Besides, the defendant can’t show prejudice. As to the merits, the search warrant was issued with probable cause and the good faith exception applies in any … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell, Staleness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Failure to file SW return doesn’t require suppression

C.D.Cal.: Defense counsel can’t make a false argument belied by evidence the govt. agreed to suppress

Defense counsel’s closing argument that was flatly contradicted by evidence the government elected to not put in in response to a motion to suppress maybe could have come in. Defense counsel can’t make a false argument to the jury without … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Defense counsel can’t make a false argument belied by evidence the govt. agreed to suppress

M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

Defendant wasn’t shown as an addressee of this package, but it was sent to his address. That alone doesn’t give him standing. United States v. Roberts, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107828 (M.D. Ala. May 18, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

“In contrast, here the State established that Maverick was a certified drug sniffing dog with a history of reliability. Maverick’s behavior, even without a full final response of sitting, was sufficient to indicate that he had detected the odors of … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Drug dog’s half sitting alert was still reliable

MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

The court of appeals erred in not applying Terry to this frisk inside defendant’s coat, instead relying on plain feel. Remanded. People v. Turner, 2023 Mich. LEXIS 937 (June 21, 2023). “Here, the warrant specifically identified the offenses for which … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Terry justified this search and seizure, not plain feel

DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

The search warrant might appear general, but it was limited by the things to be searched for. The reference to “trace evidence including but not limited to blood, hair, fibers, fluids, and fingerprints” did not make it unparticular. Trace evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: SW for “trace evidence” was particular; we know what that means

Bloomberg: Abortion Fears Spur Reverse Search Warrant Bill in California

Bloomberg: Abortion Fears Spur Reverse Search Warrant Bill in California by Titus Wu (“Privacy advocates are pushing California to be the first to crack down on a controversial investigative tool used by police that compels technology companies to turn over … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Abortion Fears Spur Reverse Search Warrant Bill in California

D.Mont.: § 1983 that Montana SWs can’t be executed on tribal lands barred by Younger

Plaintiff in Lewis & Clark County Jail sues under § 1983 that Montana search warrants can’t be executed on tribal lands. This claim is barred by Younger. Adams v. Baker, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107569 (D. Mont. June 21, 2023).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mont.: § 1983 that Montana SWs can’t be executed on tribal lands barred by Younger

OH1: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

The exclusionary rule applies only to constitutional violations, not statutory, and a violation of the probation search statute is not subject to exclusion. State v. Borger, 2023-Ohio-2025, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2044 (1st Dist. June 21, 2023). “While we note … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to statutory violations

RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

PA: Justified inquiry about presence of a firearm didn’t unreasonably extend stop

It was reasonable during defendant’s traffic stop for the officer to inquire into whether he had a firearm because the officer figured out defendant was a security guard likely with a weapon. That did not unreasonably extend the stop. Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on PA: Justified inquiry about presence of a firearm didn’t unreasonably extend stop

CA5: No preliminary injunction for copying attorney cell phone at border

An immigration attorney who claimed the government copied his cell phone four times after he returned from other countries wasn’t entitled to a preliminary injunction. “Government retention of unlawfully seized property is not sufficient, standing alone, to establish irreparable injury.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA5: No preliminary injunction for copying attorney cell phone at border