M.D.Ala.: Address alone isn’t enough to confer standing in a mailed package; name on it has to be yours

Defendant wasn’t shown as an addressee of this package, but it was sent to his address. That alone doesn’t give him standing. United States v. Roberts, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107828 (M.D. Ala. May 18, 2023), adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107073 (M.D. Ala. June 21, 2023).

Plaintiff’s § 1983 suit against his arrest and search while the criminal case goes on is barred by Younger. Cuadrado v. Naugatuck Police, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107845 (D.Conn. June 22, 2023).*

Striking the challenged portions from the affidavit still leaves probable cause, so there is no Franks violation. United States v. Hansen, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107767 (D.Neb. June 22, 2023).*

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a license plate. The number can be run. People v. Carter, 2023 Mich. App. LEXIS 4448 (June 22, 2023) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.