MO: When a backpack is abandoned, that includes the sealed packages inside it

When defendant’s backpack was abandoned, that included sealed packages inside it. State v. Fernandez, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 461 (June 27, 2023).

“Nonetheless, the Durham Court’s general statement, that having a roommate does not convert a single-family house into a multi-unit dwelling, is clearly the circumstance presented in the instant case. The Court finds that law enforcement’s search and seizure of property from Mr. Smelko’s rented rooms was properly within the scope of the search warrant for 524 Franklin Street. As such, there was no violation of Mr. Smelko’s Fourth Amendment rights.” United States v. Smelko, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109985 (W.D. Pa. June 22, 2023).*

The state court’s alleged faulty reasoning is not a reason to depart from the Stone bar. Douglas v. McCarthy, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109358 (N.D. N.Y. June 26, 2023).*

Defendant consented to a search of her person. State v. Rath, 2023-Ohio-2118 (11th Dist. June 26, 2023).

Overtinted windows justified the stop. United States v. Ybarra, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109944 (N.D. Cal. May 3, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.