W.D.Tenn.: Officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target

Law enforcement officers don’t have to corroborate CIs by doing controlled buys or traffic stops of the target. “However, in reviewing a search warrant for probable cause, a court is ‘to look holistically at what the affidavit does show, instead of focusing on what the affidavit does not contain, or the flaws of each individual component of the affidavit.’ …” United States v. Burrus, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108810 (W.D. Tenn. May 3, 2023).

The Greyhound station in Detroit is subject to constant video surveillance by the DEA looking for likely drug couriers, and showing up at the last minute is a factor they key on. When defendant was finally encountered, reasonable suspicion developed as to him for a stop. United States v. McCants, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109109 (E.D. Mich. June 16, 2023).*

Defendant was stopped for reckless driving for street racing in Tulsa. One officer smelled marijuana and warrants were found for defendant’s arrest. The search was simultaneously an automobile exception and inventory search. Cocaine was found. The search was reasonable. United States v. Phillips, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 15967 (10th Cir. June 26, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.