Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Ind. Warrant for video surveillance required under Title III

A warrant for CCTV surveillance of the defendant came under the wiretap statute, Title III, and necessity and probable cause was shown. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178457 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 4, 2023). The totality of information … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Inevitable discovery, Reasonable suspicion, Video surveillance | Comments Off on S.D.Ind. Warrant for video surveillance required under Title III

CA6: Smell of MJ on student’s person justified school search

The smell of marijuana on a student’s person justified a school search, and here it was their backpack then pockets. Stanford v. Northmont City Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26336 (6th Cir. Oct. 2, 2023). This § 1983 plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, School searches, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Smell of MJ on student’s person justified school search

OH: Written inventory not always required to justify it

The failure of officers to make a written inventory doesn’t necessarily constitutionally nullify the inventory. Officer’s testimony about the standardized procedures was sufficient without actually putting the policy into evidence. State v. Toran, 2023-Ohio-3564, 2023 Ohio LEXIS 1957 (Oct. 4, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH: Written inventory not always required to justify it

CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

The officer in a Florida traffic stop could get the driver out of the vehicle as a matter of course under Mimms. Under Maryland v. Wilson, he could order the passenger out, too. It was not clearly established law that … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officer gets QI for ordering passenger to produce ID

Guardian: TechScape: How police use location and search data to find suspects – and not always the right ones

Guardian: TechScape: How police use location and search data to find suspects – and not always the right ones (“It’s a practice public defenders, privacy advocates and many lawmakers have criticised, arguing it violates fourth amendment protections against unreasonable searches. … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Guardian: TechScape: How police use location and search data to find suspects – and not always the right ones

CA6: Incriminating nature of gun was reasonably immediately apparent to officers

The incriminating nature of an AR-15 was immediately apparent to the officers. They don’t have to know that it’s contraband, just that it’s reasonably likely. On this record, that was shown. United States v. Grier, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26077 … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Incriminating nature of gun was reasonably immediately apparent to officers

DE: When the search is overbroad, the remedy is to limit the product of the search not void it

When the search is overbroad, the remedy is to limit the product of the search not void it. Thomas v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 318 (Oct. 2, 2023). There was plenty of information from the CI on which to justify … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on DE: When the search is overbroad, the remedy is to limit the product of the search not void it

W.D.Tenn.: Home of a drug dealer does not create nexus without more evidence of a connection

The home of a drug dealer does not create nexus without more evidence of a connection. United States v. Edwards, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176766 (W.D. Tenn. Sep. 29, 2023). Plaintiff’s arrest for unlawful fishing in Manhattan’s Morningside Park was … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Nexus | Comments Off on W.D.Tenn.: Home of a drug dealer does not create nexus without more evidence of a connection

CA2: CP download 8 mo. before SW at least saved by GFE if no PC

A single download of child pornography eight months before the warrant was sought was at least supported by the good faith exception even if there wasn’t probable cause. United States v. Pratt, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 25977 (2d Cir. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA2: CP download 8 mo. before SW at least saved by GFE if no PC

Bloomberg Law: Supreme Court Passes on Police ‘Knock and Talk’ Arrest Challenge

Bloomberg Law: Supreme Court Passes on Police ‘Knock and Talk’ Arrest Challenge (“The US Supreme Court rejected a case challenging the power police have to detain people during so-called ‘knock and talk’ investigations. The justices decided on Monday not to … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, SCOTUS | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Supreme Court Passes on Police ‘Knock and Talk’ Arrest Challenge

ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

An inventory search that is a pretext for an investigatory search is unreasonable. Remanded for reconsideration of this issue. State v. Ramos, 2023 Ida. LEXIS 123 (Sep. 29, 2023). techdirt: The Casual Cruelty Of Cops: Inventory Search Edition by Tim … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on ID: Inventory as pretext for investigatory searches unreasonble

W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

Failure to make a timely return of the warrant to the issuing court is not a constitutional error, and there is no showing of prejudice. United States v. Warren, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176014 (W.D. La. Aug. 18, 2023), adopted, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Failure to make a timely return of SW papers is not a const’l error

CA11: No REP in package shipped to def’s GF where his name wasn’t on package

Defendant showed no reasonable expectation of privacy in a package of fentanyl shipped to his girlfriend at the place where he was staying. United States v. Harris, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 25677 (11th Cir. Sep. 28, 2023). Defendant’s hesitation following … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Mail and packages, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: No REP in package shipped to def’s GF where his name wasn’t on package

W.D.Va.: No objective REP in hospital room against police entry to question about shooting

Plaintiff did not have an objective reasonable expectation of privacy in preventing entry into his hospital room by law enforcement officers investing his shooting. Stoots v. Sparti, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175529 (W.D. Va. Sep. 29, 2023). “Nor does the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pretext, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No objective REP in hospital room against police entry to question about shooting

W.D.Mo.: SW found to have been served after 6 am, but even if not, no prejudice

The court’s credibility determination is that the warrant here was executed after 6:00 a.m., not before. Even if they arrived early, they didn’t enter until 6:00 a.m. “Assuming, arguendo, the officers searched Defendant’s home before 6:00 a.m., the facts demonstrate … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: SW found to have been served after 6 am, but even if not, no prejudice

CA9: SW was wholesale overbroad, and QI not properly preserved for appeal

“The Second Search Warrant authorized, among other things, without any limitation as to time, the seizure of a vast array of ‘[f]inancial information’ related to Mr. Moore and ‘associated businesses’ that constitute evidence of a crime and all electronics that … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: SW was wholesale overbroad, and QI not properly preserved for appeal

PA: LPR systems don’t violate motorists REP

“Whether use of a License Plate Reader (‘LPR’) system to track Appellant’s movements is a search under the Fourth Amendment is a question of first impression before this Court. The purpose a license plate attached to a vehicle is to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: LPR systems don’t violate motorists REP

D.Minn.: Failure to show nexus still saved by GFE because there’s always an inference

The affidavit for warrant here completely failed to link defendant’s residence to drugs. One fact was that he left there, met up with a confederate, and went to a drug deal. That wasn’t enough. Still, the good faith exception saves … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Failure to show nexus still saved by GFE because there’s always an inference

D.Ariz.: No RS for stop, but def fled when tried to be pulled over and that was

Taking the government’s six proffered circumstances which they claim add up to reasonable suspicion, the court finds them lacking on the totality. But, as defendant was being pulled over, he fled, and that made reasonable suspicion. United State v. Shelton, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No RS for stop, but def fled when tried to be pulled over and that was

NBC News: Marion, Kansas, police chief suspended following series of raids

NBC News: Marion, Kansas, police chief suspended following series of raids (“The Marion, Kansas, police chief was suspended this week following a series of raids that included the office of a local newspaper and the home of the city’s vice … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Privileges | Comments Off on NBC News: Marion, Kansas, police chief suspended following series of raids