Author Archives: Hall

TX5: Even with legalized hemp, smell of MJ from car is still PC

The smell of marijuana from a vehicle is probable cause even if legal hemp can be mistaken for it. State v. Gonzales, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 7827 (Tex. App. – Dallas Oct. 12, 2023). Plaintiff’s claim for false arrest for … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on TX5: Even with legalized hemp, smell of MJ from car is still PC

DE: Def consented to search of his cell phone in an effort to prove his alibi

Defendant consented to search of his cell phone in an effort to prove his alibi. Blackwood v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 328 (Oct. 11, 2023). Defendant’s guilty plea wasn’t a conditional plea, so the search issue was waived. If he … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Def consented to search of his cell phone in an effort to prove his alibi

W.D.Wash.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest not invalid because it preceded actual arrest

Seizure of defendant’s cell phone incident to arrest wasn’t unreasonable just because it was seized before the arrest. United States v. Garg, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183140 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 11, 2023). An extraneous name appearing in a warrant affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Seizure of cell phone incident to arrest not invalid because it preceded actual arrest

CA9: Passenger has standing to challenge reasonableness of length of stop

Defendant passenger had standing to challenge the length of the stop because it was his detention, too. There was, however, reasonable suspicion for that. United States v. Alvarez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26980 (9th Cir. Oct. 10, 2023). “Stiff failed … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Passenger has standing to challenge reasonableness of length of stop

NPR: ‘Too dangerous’: Why even Google was afraid to release this technology

NPR: ‘Too dangerous’: Why even Google was afraid to release this technology by Bobby Allyn (“Imagine strolling down a busy city street and snapping a photo of a stranger then uploading it into a search engine that almost instantaneously helps … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NPR: ‘Too dangerous’: Why even Google was afraid to release this technology

CA11: Pretext for a criminal search can be an issue in administrative searches

Pretext for a criminal search can be an issue in administrative searches. “Accordingly, the district court erred in failing to recognize the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the February 2015 administrative search was focused … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA11: Pretext for a criminal search can be an issue in administrative searches

CA3: SoL for illegal search claims not tolled by incarcerated

Plaintiff inmate’s statute of limitations for an illegal search claim starts when he should be aware of the claim and it is not tolled while he is incarcerated. Poteat v. Lydon, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26961 (3d Cir. Oct. 11, … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: SoL for illegal search claims not tolled by incarcerated

CA8: Continuation of arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer QI

Continuation of plaintiff’s arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer qualified immunity. “Even if we concluded Officer Holtan made a reasonable mistake about probable cause when he first tackled Nieters to the ground, Nieters immediately informed … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: Continuation of arrest after the officer learned it was unjustified denied the officer QI

N.D.Ala.: Whether DTF officer could make speeding stops was a reasonable mistake of law under Heien

The task force officer involved allegedly wasn’t authorized to make speeding traffic stops, but this was a reasonable mistake of law under Heien. United States v. Shepherd, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181976 (N.D. Ala. Oct. 10, 2023). The bulge in … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Whether DTF officer could make speeding stops was a reasonable mistake of law under Heien

D.Haw.: 11-month delay in getting DNA warrant was reasonable

An eleven month delay in the government obtaining a DNA warrant was reasonable. “Under the totality of the circumstances, the Court concludes that, while the search warrant perhaps could have been sought earlier, the eleven-month period between arrest and the … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, geofence, Private search, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Haw.: 11-month delay in getting DNA warrant was reasonable

D.N.M.: RS not needed for questions at a fixed immigration checkpoint

Defendant’s questioning about his work at a fixed immigration checkpoint did not require reasonable suspicion. United States v. Briscoe, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181188 (D.N.M. Oct. 6, 2023). There was reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop at gunpoint for his being … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Immigration checkpoints, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: RS not needed for questions at a fixed immigration checkpoint

D.Mont.: Def’s interest in his package is a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time

When a package in transit is detained for investigation, the person named on the package has an interest in a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time. United States v. Hamlin, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180215 (D. Mont. Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Def’s interest in his package is a reasonable delivery time, but not an exact time

MA: Officer recording drug deal on cell phone governed by state wiretap law

An officer’s surreptitious recording of a drug deal with a cell phone is an interception of a communication under the state wiretapping law. Commonwealth v. Du, 2023 Mass. App. LEXIS 143 (Oct. 6, 2023). The publicly available address (SoS, website, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Video surveillance | Comments Off on MA: Officer recording drug deal on cell phone governed by state wiretap law

DE: High crime area + messy car ≠ RS

Defendant lived in a “high crime area,” and that did not make his car subject to search just because of alleged tips. “When Officer Millner asked Defendant whether there were guns or drugs in the vehicle, Defendant replied ‘no’ and … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: High crime area + messy car ≠ RS

OH7: Def didn’t impliedly consent to officer’s entry into hotel room when def was getting his ID

The officer encountered defendant in the hotel lobby. He asked for defendant’s ID, and defendant said he had to go to his room to get it. The officer asked if he could accompany him to the room. The officer’s entry … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inventory, Voluntariness | Comments Off on OH7: Def didn’t impliedly consent to officer’s entry into hotel room when def was getting his ID

N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

Defendant’s motion to suppress based on the state court judge issuing the warrant lacking jurisdiction is denied on the merits and by the good faith exception. United States v. Bailey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179249 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Good faith exception, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Motion to suppress based on state court issuing judge lacking jurisdiction saved by GFE even if true

CA10: Inevitable discovery applies despite lack of PC in first SW

Even though the initial search warrant was issued without probable cause, inevitable discovery can still apply. United States v. Streett, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 26423 (10th Cir. Oct. 5, 2023):

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on CA10: Inevitable discovery applies despite lack of PC in first SW

W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope

An administrative subpoena duces tecum to Starbucks is enforced. It is reasonable in scope. Su v. Starbucks Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179355 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 4, 2023):

Posted in Administrative search, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Administrative SDT to Starbucks is reasonable in scope

W.D.N.Y.: Parolee had standing in place searched despite his reduced REP

The R&R determined that defendant parolee had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched because of his parole status alone. The District Judge disagrees, finds enough standing to contest the search, and remands to the USMJ to decide … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Parolee had standing in place searched despite his reduced REP

AR: Dog alerted outside before it went in open door to sniff again

A drug dog alerted on defendant’s car before the dog approached an open door and sniffed inside, too. The outside alert made the inside alert reasonable. Fleming v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 439 (Oct. 4, 2023). Officers received an anonymous … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on AR: Dog alerted outside before it went in open door to sniff again