Category Archives: Inventory

TX2: Overnight guest staying with a registered hotel guest has standing over the room

“[A]n overnight guest of a registered hotel guest shares the registered guest’s reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel room and thus has standing to contest the search.” Fitzgerald v. State, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 6161 n.11 (Tex. App. — … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Inventory, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on TX2: Overnight guest staying with a registered hotel guest has standing over the room

W.D.Okla.: Search of hotel room lacked justification under community caretaking function; allied SW lacked PC

The search of defendant’s hotel room was without probable cause or any other justification for a warrantless search, here the community caretaking function. That search supported a warranted search, but it was necessary to the finding of probable cause for … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Search of hotel room lacked justification under community caretaking function; allied SW lacked PC

D.Mass.: Def had standing to challenge inventory but not the stop

“In sum, the Court finds that the failure to comply with each of these clearly-written standardized procedures contributes to a finding that the purported inventory search was improperly conducted.” Also, defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the stop of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Def had standing to challenge inventory but not the stop

E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

Exposure to Covid-19 in prison didn’t state a Fourth or Eighth Amendment claim. Dingle v. Tommage, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124710 (E.D. Pa. July 16, 2024). Defendant was driving with a suspended license, and WVSP protocol dictated impoundment of the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Exposure to Covid-19 in prison doesn’t state a 4A or 8A claim

W.D.Pa.: US Private Vaults safety deposit boxes in California could be inventoried by FBI leading to case here

The FBI obtained a search warrant for the premises at US Private Vaults in Beverly Hills, California. The probable cause was based on a belief USPV was engaged in money laundering. The FBI went further and inventoried the safety deposit … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: US Private Vaults safety deposit boxes in California could be inventoried by FBI leading to case here

D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable

The owner of a vehicle who was not driving or in it when it was stopped has no standing to challenge the stop as opposed to an inventory search. “After considering, as it must, ‘all the facts and circumstances’ of … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Owner of vehicle not in it can’t challenge stop, but he can the inventory which was unreasonable

TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

The affidavit for a search warrant was redacted and admitted as evidence at trial by agreement. The issue was waived and is subject to plain error review, and it’s not plain error. Even if it was, it was harmless error … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

E.D.Cal.: Change in facts after SW application emailed to USMJ but before signing wasn’t material or knowing false statement

There was no Franks violation where the government emailed to the USMJ the search warrant request where defendant was arranging to meet an officer in a sting operation before defendant called off the meeting. This change wasn’t material to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Change in facts after SW application emailed to USMJ but before signing wasn’t material or knowing false statement

D.N.M.: DEA’s failure to make a detailed inventory in violation of policy doesn’t require exclusion of evidence

The DEA’s failure to make a detailed inventory is not grounds to suppress the inventory, citing cases from other circuits. United States v. Veale, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88011 (D.N.M. May 15, 2024). Sometimes clients are their own worst enemy … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.M.: DEA’s failure to make a detailed inventory in violation of policy doesn’t require exclusion of evidence

MO: Search incident can happen at mobile booking center without going to jail

A search incident can occur even where defendant is at a mobile booking place without being transported to jail. State v. Boehmer, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 314 (May 14, 2024). Defendant’s concession in the trial court that the stop and … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Reasonableness, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Search incident can happen at mobile booking center without going to jail

NM: New crime after alleged illegal seizure not suppressed

Defendant’s new crimes after his alleged illegal seizure are not suppressed. State v. Morgan, 2024 N.M. App. LEXIS 23 (May 13, 2024). Tossing a backpack in flight from the police is abandonment. United States v. Anderson, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Attenuation, geofence, Inevitable discovery, Inventory | Comments Off on NM: New crime after alleged illegal seizure not suppressed

CA9: Compliance or not with inventory procedure is a part of totality of circumstances; here they were investigating

Compliance or not with inventory procedure is a factor in the totality of circumstances. Here, the totality showed that the officers were investigating, not just inventorying. Denial of suppression reversed. United States v. Anderson, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 10708 (9th … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CA9: Compliance or not with inventory procedure is a part of totality of circumstances; here they were investigating

M.D.Pa.: Def was neither shipper nor recipient of USPS parcel, so he had no standing in it

Defendant was neither the shipper nor recipient of a USPS parcel with drugs in it, opened six weeks after it was unclaimed. He had no standing in it. United States v. Bell, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78182 (M.D. Pa. Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Inventory, Mail and packages, Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Def was neither shipper nor recipient of USPS parcel, so he had no standing in it

E.D.N.Y.: The search of def’s house started about 6:10 am; the camera time hadn’t been adjusted for DST

Defendant submitted that the search of his house started at 5:00 am. The officers and virtually all the evidence showed it started at 6:10 am. The metadata on some photographs showed 5:16 am. The court finds the camera’s time hadn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Nighttime search, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: The search of def’s house started about 6:10 am; the camera time hadn’t been adjusted for DST

CA9: Inventory of backpack before handing it to released defendant was reasonable and within policy

Defendant’s backpack was lawfully inventory searched by the police before returning it to him after he’d been released. They substantially complied with policy. United States v. Sapalasan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 7580 (9th Cir. Apr. 1, 2024) (2-1). A motion … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Inventory | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack before handing it to released defendant was reasonable and within policy

NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

The ability to seize a cell phone with exigent circumstances doesn’t include the state’s ability to search it without a warrant. Smith v. State, 2024 Nev. LEXIS 14 (Mar. 28, 2024). Defendant wasn’t seized when the officer first approached him. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Seizure | Comments Off on NV: The state’s ability to seize a cell phone with exigency doesn’t include the power to search it

GA: SW for marijuana supported plain view seizure of firearms, ammunition, and body armor

Police had a search warrant for marijuana. “[E]ven if the seizure of the firearms, ammunition, and body armor is not within the scope of the warrant, we agree with the State that law enforcement was authorized to seize these items … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW for marijuana supported plain view seizure of firearms, ammunition, and body armor

MO: Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person

Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person the same as jailing an alleged offender. State v. Williams, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 131 (Mar. 5, 2024). Some of the information in the affidavit didn’t provide a time frame, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person

OH3: 9-1-1 call about possible fire in def’s home justified FD entry; plain view resulted.

A 9-1-1 call about a fire in defendant’s home revealed by heavy black smoke from the chimney brought the fire and police departments who entered. The fire scene entry and the plain view were reasonable under Michigan v. Tyler. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Inventory | Comments Off on OH3: 9-1-1 call about possible fire in def’s home justified FD entry; plain view resulted.

CA9: Wholesale inventory searches of private safe deposit boxes in SW for business was unreasonable

US Private Vaults case reversed. The search of USPV’s 700 safe deposit boxes for inventory was unreasonable. The FBI obtained a warrant for USPV’s business because of its business practices, and this search of the safe deposit boxes of customers … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA9: Wholesale inventory searches of private safe deposit boxes in SW for business was unreasonable