E.D.Cal.: Change in facts after SW application emailed to USMJ but before signing wasn’t material or knowing false statement

There was no Franks violation where the government emailed to the USMJ the search warrant request where defendant was arranging to meet an officer in a sting operation before defendant called off the meeting. This change wasn’t material to the other probable cause. It also wasn’t false when made. United States v. Githens, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92780 (E.D. Cal. May 22, 2024).*

Where the record wasn’t clear that defendant abandoned his cell phone but lost it because of a car crash, there wasn’t abandonment. As to inventory, “the Court here does not have sufficient evidence to determine whether there are appropriate safeguards on the GPD policy that apparently authorized this search. And where such safeguards cannot be ascertained, the inventory search cannot be upheld as an exception to the Fourth Amendment.” Guam v. Taimanglo, 2024 Guam Trial Order LEXIS 1 (Apr. 3, 2024).*

Defendant was detained but not yet arrested. “From these cases, it is clear that the use of physical restraints during a traffic stop does not automatically transform a detention into an arrest. Instead, physical restraints are merely one factor in the ‘fact-specific inquiry [] guided by the general Fourth Amendment requirement of reasonableness.’” The patdown was on reasonable suspicion. Guam v. Nicolas, 2024 Guam Trial Order LEXIS 57 (Apr. 3, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Inventory, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.