Category Archives: Probable cause

E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

This geofence warrant was slightly different than Chatrie’s. Still, the good faith exception applies. “In this case, law enforcement acted pursuant to a warrant that was not so facially deficient that the executing officers could not reasonably presume it to … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, geofence, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Geofence warrant slightly different than Chatrie still in good faith

TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

Plain view of bullet holes in defendant’s truck justified its seizure and transport to police impound lot where it was searched with a warrant. Lee v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7569 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 30, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on TX4: Bullet holes in truck justified its seizure for SW

E.D.Mich.: Someone else’s search doesn’t affect defendant

Defendant has no standing to challenge the search of others that affected him, a theory rejected in Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 171-172 (1969). United States v. Phillips, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190766 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 26, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Someone else’s search doesn’t affect defendant

OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

Alleged defects in which court should or could issue this particular warrant was subject to the good faith exception. There was no contention that the affidavit for warrant lacked probable cause. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on OH5: Alleged jurisdictional defect in warrant issuance didn’t undermine PC; no dispute as to that

N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

No case says that officers can’t rely on defendant’s own statement when relying on it as probable cause. They don’t have to prove it up. United States v. Alexander, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185275 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 22, 2025). “Sales’ … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Def’s own statement can be PC without having to prove it

E.D.Pa.: Two minute “roadblock” for GPS tracked stolen cell phone was reasonable

A two minute “roadblock” to stop robbery suspects with a stolen cell phone transmitting its GPS location was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185143 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2025). The limitation on search warrants … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Roadblocks | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Two minute “roadblock” for GPS tracked stolen cell phone was reasonable

S.D.Ill.: Search of room adjoining arrest wasn’t valid as SI or protective sweep

Defendant had standing as an occasional overnight guest in his ex-girlfriend’s apartment when he was there when the police arrived to arrest him. The search of another room was neither valid as a search incident or protective sweep. Motion to … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Search incident, Standards of review | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Search of room adjoining arrest wasn’t valid as SI or protective sweep

E.D.Pa.: Def succeeds in suppressing a stop when he even lacked standing to challenge the search

Defendant was a passenger in the car that was stopped. While he wouldn’t have standing in the car, he persuaded the court that the stop lacked justification based on credibility of witnesses, and the motion to suppress is granted. United … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Def succeeds in suppressing a stop when he even lacked standing to challenge the search

LA1: Information negating PC should have been included, but doesn’t matter here

Omitted information didn’t negate probable cause. “When considering the totality of the other facts included in the affidavit, the negative lab results do not negate the existence of probable cause for the search warrant. Here, the trial court admonished the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on LA1: Information negating PC should have been included, but doesn’t matter here

CT: “All data” warrant was unreasonable, but harmless on all the facts

The warrant for “all data” on defendant’s cell phone violated the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement, even though it was limited to two weeks before the murder. Yet, the state’s case was so strong, the cell phone data was harmless beyond … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Probable cause | Comments Off on CT: “All data” warrant was unreasonable, but harmless on all the facts

VA: Retrieving drugs from def’s underwear wasn’t unreasonable

Retrieving a bag of drugs from defendant’s underwear with probable cause was still reasonable. The court of appeals erred in reversing. Commonwealth v. Hubbard, 2025 Va. LEXIS 44 (Sep. 11, 2025) (revg Hubbard v. Commonwealth, 80 Va. App. 384, 898 … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on VA: Retrieving drugs from def’s underwear wasn’t unreasonable

CA6: Business’s sole other employee had apparent authority to consent

Plaintiff’s adult child was the sole other employee of the business, and he had apparent authority to consent to a search. For all practical purpose, he’s in charge, too. Rockwood Auto Parts, Inc. v. Monroe Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Exclusionary rule, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Business’s sole other employee had apparent authority to consent

CA10: Having the driver get out is within the scope of any traffic stop

Having the driver come back to the patrol car is a basic safety concern within the scope of any traffic stop. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 23113 (10th Cir. Sep. 8, 2025). “Voorhis’s false arrest claim is … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Having the driver get out is within the scope of any traffic stop

E.D.La.: AirBnb permittees have no REP in information already voluntarily provided to city

AirBnb and its permittees don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in information that was already essentially turned over to the city in getting permits in the first place. Bodin v. City of New Orleans, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174172 … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on E.D.La.: AirBnb permittees have no REP in information already voluntarily provided to city

W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

Defendant’s hiding a small pouch in another person’s car was not abandonment. He otherwise manifested a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Jensen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170474 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2025). Defendant’s encounter with the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

E.D.Cal.: Excessive prison strip search sufficiently alleged

Prison strip search: “Here, liberally construed, it appears plaintiff may be able to state a Fourth Amendment claim against the defendants who stripped plaintiff naked where it is alleged that plaintiff was brought to the ASU from the program office … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Excessive prison strip search sufficiently alleged

MD: Pretext inquiry under state constitution same as 4A

Appellant shows no basis for construing pretextual stops under the state constitution differently than the Fourth Amendment. Riley v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 727 (Aug. 27, 2025).* Defendant’s encounter with the officer here after one with mall security was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Pretext, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on MD: Pretext inquiry under state constitution same as 4A

TX13: Even if hemp and MJ smell similar, smell is still PC

The Dallas Court of Appeals “concluded that the odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle gave an officer probable cause to search the vehicle and its occupants, even though the odor of marijuana is indistinguishable from the odor of hemp.” … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX13: Even if hemp and MJ smell similar, smell is still PC

W.D.N.C.: Court order issued under the SCA was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant

A court order issued under the Stored Communications Act was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant. United States v. Whittaker, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169034 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 7, 2025). “Therefore, in addition to Agent Namey’s experience and explanation, the … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Stored Communications Act, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Court order issued under the SCA was sufficient as a substitute for a warrant

IL: Reasonable to believe def had cell phone with him in car when shooting occurred

It was a reasonable conclusion that defendant’s cell phone would have information about this shooting incident. It was reasonable to believe that he had his phone when driving. The time period was also reasonably limited. People v. Terrell, 2025 IL … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: Reasonable to believe def had cell phone with him in car when shooting occurred