Category Archives: Probable cause

MI: Smell of MJ from a vehicle no longer PC

In Michigan, because of legalization of recreational marijuana the smell of marijuana from a vehicle is no longer probable cause to search. People v. Armstrong, 2025 Mich. LEXIS 583 (April 2, 2025). From the court’s syllabus:

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MI: Smell of MJ from a vehicle no longer PC

OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

The warrants database showed a warrant for defendant, but it actually had been recalled. The officer checked dispatch who told him of the warrant, although defendant denied there was one, but he had a motive to lie to avoid arrest. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

“The totality of the evidence before the issuing judge was sufficient to establish probable cause. Detective Salley’s affidavit in support of the search warrant had outlined observations that law enforcement had made during surveillance of the Astro Drive Residence, which, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

Cal.1st: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspensions

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspension proceedings. Kazelka v. Cal. Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 196 (1st Dist. Mar. 27, 2025). Officers responded to a shots fired call in a Bronx apartment and entered and … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspensions

WA: Mandatory UAs valid on supervision despite not being related to crime of conviction

Even though mandatory UA for drug and alcohol don’t directly relate to defendant’s crimes of conviction, there still is a compelling interest in the state being able to test. State v. Nelson, 2025 Wash. LEXIS 150 (Mar. 27, 2025). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Mandatory UAs valid on supervision despite not being related to crime of conviction

W.D.Va.: No REP in non-legal jail mail from being scanned for tablet viewing

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in non-legal mail in jail. Here, mail was scanned and made into a pdf for viewing on a tablet. Cecil v. Keller, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56313 (W.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2025).* A … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP in non-legal jail mail from being scanned for tablet viewing

E.D.La.: Def’s presence at another SW execution admissible under 404(b)

Defendant’s presence at a drug house when another search warrant was served is admissible under 404(b). United States v. Holmes, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55926 (E.D. La. Mar. 26, 2025).* Defendant’s performance on SFSTs was probable cause for his arrest … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Def’s presence at another SW execution admissible under 404(b)

D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

Asking the same question of defendant a different way three times while doing the traffic citation did not unreasonably prolong the stop. The officer said he was not trying to be “robotic” sounding. United States v. Burns, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Officer asking same question three different ways didn’t unreasonably prolong the stop

PA: Entry of curtilage to inquire of a chop shop in operation was reasonable

Officers saw defendant “dissecting a motor vehicle in his driveway,” i.e., running a chop shop, which they already suspected him of. They could enter the curtilage to inquire. Commonwealth v. Ewida, 2025 PA Super 67, 2025 Pa. Super. LEXIS 128 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on PA: Entry of curtilage to inquire of a chop shop in operation was reasonable

GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

While the stopping officer was filling out the citation, a second officer arrived. The dog sniff occurred while the citation was still being filled out, so it didn’t extend the stop. Grant of motion to suppress reversed. State v. Dean, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff of car while citation being filled out did not extend stop; suppression reversed

D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

The search warrant was ostensibly for a particular Motel 6 and room number, but the warrant completely omitted reference to the place to be searched. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47675 (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2025). When … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be: “Here, the affidavit sought to establish probable cause to believe Mr. Erickson took part in an ongoing scheme to evade paying taxes. Toward that end, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Probable cause for evidence of tax evasion in the home where records would be

E.D.Tenn.: Ammunition on the person is PC for firearm in the home

Possession on the person of a significant amount of ammunition was probable cause and nexus to defendant’s house for the firearm. United States v. Partin, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47025 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 14, 2025). Probable cause for evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Ammunition on the person is PC for firearm in the home

E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

“Under Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit law, Detective Erwin’s professional opinion [based on her experience] that the file contained child pornography was sufficient to establish probable case for the issuance of the search warrant. See Ornelas, 517 U.S. at 700; … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Single image that officer opined was CP is PC

D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

SnapChat warrant wasn’t stale: “The passage of more than six months between Cardoso’s messages to Pyrtle and issuance of the October 2021 warrant did not undermine probable cause to believe that data from Pyrtle’s Snapchat account would provide evidence of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SnapChat warrant didn’t go stale after six months [would it ever?]

CA9: State officers can consider federal crimes in assessing PC

The district court erred three ways in this case: The potential of a federal crime could be considered by the officer in determining probable cause. There was reasonable suspicion to prolong the stop. The automobile exception applied. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: State officers can consider federal crimes in assessing PC

CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

“The crux of the Gammarinos’ [Fourth Amendment] argument is that the Defendants entered their properties and removed their personal property without a warrant. As a result, they claim these searches and seizures are presumptively unreasonable and thus violated the Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

CA6: Nexus to home based on controlled buys doesn’t require constant visual surveillance

Controlled buys that included trips to defendant’s house was nexus. “Regardless of whether Sims was constantly within the detectives’ view, the affidavit establishes that for each controlled buy, Sims went straight to the buy location from the residence and returned … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus to home based on controlled buys doesn’t require constant visual surveillance

WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

Warning of a right to refuse a consent search is only required for knock-and-talk. This was an animal cruelty case, and officers had been there repeatedly to observe horses with consent. Finally, they got a warrant to enter the enclosure … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

TX2: Concurring opinion where SW wasn’t based on PC

A concurring opinion where there wasn’t probable cause for a search warrant, which is really hard to do these days: Staley v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1523 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Mar. 6, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX2: Concurring opinion where SW wasn’t based on PC