WI: Not coercive to tell def officer will get SW if he doesn’t consent when there is PC

It’s not coercive to tell a suspect that the officer will get a search warrant if he doesn’t consent when there’s probable cause. State v. Gore, 2025 Wisc. App. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 7, 2025).

There was probable cause for defendant’s vehicle search under the automobile exception. United States v. Lopez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235816 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 4, 2024),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1689 (M.D. Ala. Jan. 6, 2025).*

“The administration of the SFSTs in this case, while flawed, yielded sufficient clues of intoxication that, when combined with the officer’s other observations, established probable cause for Defendant’s arrest.” United States v. Villarreal, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2253 (W.D. La. Jan. 3, 2025).*

Despite plaintiff stopping his car, the officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the law was not clearly established that firing at plaintiff after his vehicle collided and stopped, but still potentially posed a threat, violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Manery v. Lee, No. 24-1292, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 314 (7th Cir. Jan. 7, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Probable cause, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.