Category Archives: Good faith exception

E.D.Mich.: PC showing was thin, but good enough for the GFE

The probable cause showing was thin, but it was enough, and the good faith exception applies in any event. United States v. Mills, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102174 (E.D. Mich. May 29, 2025)*:

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: PC showing was thin, but good enough for the GFE

MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

Uncorroborated anonymous tip: “Because the affidavit relies almost entirely on an uncorroborated anonymous tip and includes no information regarding the tipster’s reliability or the specific details of the anonymous tip, it failed to supply the warrant-issuing judge with a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

M.D.Fla.: Incomplete PC showing here was essentially knowing, so motion to suppress granted

The police here presented incomplete probable cause here that a phone call could have corrected. Since the officer knew it (and that probable cause might be lacking) and said he was charging defendant anyway, the motion to suppress the automobile … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Incomplete PC showing here was essentially knowing, so motion to suppress granted

CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

“Even if the search-warrant affidavit at issue lacked probable cause, the district court did not err in denying Noble’s motion to suppress because the good-faith exception applies. The search-warrant affidavit is not bare bones.” The smell of marijuana coming from … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

TX: Fraudulently renting hotel room denies a REP

Fraudulently renting a hotel room means no reasonable expectation of privacy in it. And, it didn’t matter that the police didn’t learn that until later. Bluntson v. State, 2025 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 297 (May 7, 2025). At the oral … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX: Fraudulently renting hotel room denies a REP

D.Neb.: First time CI was corroborated

This first time CI, arrested the day before, was corroborated and there was probable cause. United States v. Schelling, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83754 (D. Neb. May 2, 2025).* There was reasonable suspicion with collective knowledge, and the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Neb.: First time CI was corroborated

N.D.Ala.: Lack of a SW signature cured by GFE

“Defendant argues that the warrant is facially deficient because the affidavit lacked a signature, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit has considered and rejected this argument. See United States v. Gordon, 686 F. App’x 702, 704 (11th Cir. 2017) (holding … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Lack of a SW signature cured by GFE

CA4 (en banc): Geofence warrant was in good faith; no decision on merits

The Fourth Circuit dodges deciding the merits of geofence warrants by going with good faith in a per curiam virtually summary affirmance with 124 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions. Having heard the excellent, spirited oral argument, this was where … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4 (en banc): Geofence warrant was in good faith; no decision on merits

E.D.N.Y.: Re-search of email in 2024 on a 2022 SW was unreasonable and not protected by GFE

The government seized seven years of defendants’ email records in 2022 but the FBI’s computer somehow lost it. So they re-searched the data in 2024. “The Government asserts that it accessed the full return of data received pursuant to the … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Good faith exception, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Re-search of email in 2024 on a 2022 SW was unreasonable and not protected by GFE

S.D.Cal.: Second look at computer for CP based on court order was reasonable and in good faith

Defendant’s computer was seized and searched for child pornography. After the initial warrant, the government applied for permission to reexamine the computer media. The second look was justified, and the good faith exception applies because it involves reliance on a … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Second look at computer for CP based on court order was reasonable and in good faith

N.D.Miss.: An actual “bare bones” affidavit for SW leads to suppression

A “bare bones” affidavit for search warrant in a drug case attested to over Facetime with no real support showed “A lackadaisical approach to constitutional safeguards demonstrates a disregard for the judicial system.” Motion to suppress granted; no good faith … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: An actual “bare bones” affidavit for SW leads to suppression

S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

Defendant was in pretrial detention arrested three days earlier in a murder-for-hire scheme. Jailors searched his cell, apparently as a part of the original criminal investigation, looking for cell phone which he attempted to destroy. He moved to suppress. “The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

The warrants database showed a warrant for defendant, but it actually had been recalled. The officer checked dispatch who told him of the warrant, although defendant denied there was one, but he had a motive to lie to avoid arrest. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

“The totality of the evidence before the issuing judge was sufficient to establish probable cause. Detective Salley’s affidavit in support of the search warrant had outlined observations that law enforcement had made during surveillance of the Astro Drive Residence, which, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on IN: State’s reliance on GFE not waived where it didn’t argue it but trial court decided it

E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

The affidavit for search warrant here was based on suspicious circumstances but doesn’t show nexus to defendant’s house that he was engaging in drug trafficking from there just from living there. “Ultimately, the evidence in the affidavit did not create … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: SW affidavit failed to show PC for search of house, but it wasn’t so lacking the GFE doesn’t apply

D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

The search warrant was ostensibly for a particular Motel 6 and room number, but the warrant completely omitted reference to the place to be searched. United States v. Brown, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47675 (D. Minn. Mar. 13, 2025). When … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: SW’s failure to include motel name, address, and room number failed particularity

CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

“The crux of the Gammarinos’ [Fourth Amendment] argument is that the Defendants entered their properties and removed their personal property without a warrant. As a result, they claim these searches and seizures are presumptively unreasonable and thus violated the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

TX2: Concurring opinion where SW wasn’t based on PC

A concurring opinion where there wasn’t probable cause for a search warrant, which is really hard to do these days: Staley v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1523 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Mar. 6, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX2: Concurring opinion where SW wasn’t based on PC

CA5: The affidavit for SW was more than “bare bones” and the GFE applied

The affidavit for the warrant wasn’t “bare bones.” It alleged facts and nexus could be inferred, even if probable cause couldn’t be fully shown. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. United States v. Norman, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4908 (5th … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: The affidavit for SW was more than “bare bones” and the GFE applied

VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual

The towing of defendant’s car left on the interstate without a valid LPN was reasonable. The officers didn’t have to permit him to find his own sources. The inventory was not proved to be pretextual. “But the departures from procedure … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Pretext | Comments Off on VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual