OH4: Arrest on recalled warrant still valid under GFE

The warrants database showed a warrant for defendant, but it actually had been recalled. The officer checked dispatch who told him of the warrant, although defendant denied there was one, but he had a motive to lie to avoid arrest. The officer wasn’t obligated to obtain the actual warrant before arresting. The officer did nothing wrong, and the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply. State v. Remy, 2025-Ohio-1137, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1085 (4th Dist. Mar. 27, 2025).

On a no merit brief: “After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying Allen’s motion to suppress, as the search warrant was based on probable cause, and it was not overbroad or lacking in particularity. … In any event, nothing in the record indicated the officers did not execute the warrant in good faith.” United States v. Allen, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 7185 (8th Cir. Mar. 28, 2025).*

Defendant’s search incident was valid because there was probable cause to arrest him for carrying a weapon without a license in violation of Delaware law. United States v. Wing, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59213 (D. Del. Mar. 28, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.