S.D.N.Y.: Warrantless criminal investigative cell search was reasonable

Defendant was in pretrial detention arrested three days earlier in a murder-for-hire scheme. Jailors searched his cell, apparently as a part of the original criminal investigation, looking for cell phone which he attempted to destroy. He moved to suppress. “The Court denies McBean’s motion. Under Hudson and its progeny, McBean lacked an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in his MDC cell, barring him from challenging the search of his cell under the Fourth Amendment. That is so even assuming that, under this line of authority, McBean retained a limited privacy interest with respect to searches undertaken solely for law enforcement investigative purposes that did not implicate prison security interests, because that interest of his was not implicated here. The Court therefore denies his motion to suppress.” United States v. McBean, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71775 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2025).

Officers searching for a person in a house could look between the mattress and box springs for people because that’s a fairly common hiding place. A gun found was in plain view. Morris v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 221 (Apr. 15, 2025) (unpublished).*

The state search warrant allegedly was issued without probable cause, but the good faith exception applies in any event. United States v. Grant, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71732 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2025).*

Petitioner’s search claim doesn’t support a successor habeas. In re Mitchell, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8919 (5th Cir. Apr. 15, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.