Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Wis.: Failure to cross a trial witness about a search claim isn’t IAC

Failure to cross-examine a trial witness about a potential Fourth Amendment violation is not ineffective assistance of counsel because a jury trial is not the place to resolve a search claim. Kawleski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70540 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Failure to cross a trial witness about a search claim isn’t IAC

S.D.Ind.: No IAC for not better arguing GFE

Failure to better confront the good faith exception before conviction wasn’t ineffective assistance. Ramirez-Prado v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68941 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 31, 2026):

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: No IAC for not better arguing GFE

CA8: DMV records showing car’s insurance couldn’t be verified justified stop to inquire

DMV records showing car’s insurance couldn’t be verified justified stop to inquire. United States v. Mitchell, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 9185 (8th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). The police department did not make a valid and enforceable request for text messages … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA8: DMV records showing car’s insurance couldn’t be verified justified stop to inquire

CA9: First cell phone warrant was issued day after seizure; second a year later wasn’t unreasonable

The day after defendant’s cell phone was seized, the government obtained a search warrant for it, and the warrant had a 90-day execution provision. Defendant concedes probable cause. The fact it took a year before a second warrant for the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA9: First cell phone warrant was issued day after seizure; second a year later wasn’t unreasonable

MS: By denying living at the place searched, def lacked standing to challenge its search

By denying living at the place searched, defendant lacked standing to challenge its search. Armstrong v. State, 2026 Miss. App. LEXIS 151 (Mar. 31, 2026). In addition, “Bailey’s non-compliance with the deputies’ commands and expressions of suicidal intent—with an alleged … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on MS: By denying living at the place searched, def lacked standing to challenge its search

E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

The CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved isn’t really a Franks violation. United States v. Mooneyham, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67746 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2026). Plaintiff reasonably believed that one of the officers was sitting on him … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity, Search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: CI’s being incorrect about which drug was involved wasn’t material

OH9: Arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house permitted entry under Payton

Officers had an arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house, and that permitted their entry under Payton. State v. Cecil, 2026-Ohio-1100 (9th Dist. Mar. 30, 2026). The record on who actually consented or had apparent authority is incomplete, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on OH9: Arrest warrant for a co-occupant of the house permitted entry under Payton

CA7: A temporary “want” not based on PC or a judicial determination wasn’t a basis for entry

The city here uses a “temporary” want, not based on probable cause, to enter plaintiff’s home. Plaintiff stated a claim for failure to train that a warrant is required, not something based on the officer’s action. Milbeck v. George, 2026 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: A temporary “want” not based on PC or a judicial determination wasn’t a basis for entry

IA: Backpack carried into premises by visitor just before SW executed was within scope of warrant

Police were watching a Des Moines house waiting to execute a search warrant. Defendant showed up and entered the house with a backpack. Then they entered on the warrant. The backpack was within the particular description in the warrant. When … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search | Comments Off on IA: Backpack carried into premises by visitor just before SW executed was within scope of warrant

AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop in a residential neighborhood when he was lawfully parked and doing nothing wrong. The officer pulled behind him with emergency lights on. That’s not always a seizure, but here it was. When … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

E.D.Pa.: “computer(s), smart device(s), cellular phone(s), gaming console hardware(s), software, digital storage media, and their associated peripherals” is particular

In a child pornography case, “computer(s), smart device(s), cellular phone(s), gaming console hardware(s), software, digital storage media, and their associated peripherals” is particular enough. United States v. Margerum, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65406 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 26, 2026):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: “computer(s), smart device(s), cellular phone(s), gaming console hardware(s), software, digital storage media, and their associated peripherals” is particular

PA: Having a gun in your car is not RS, but lying about not having one is when the officer sees it

Even a collection of innocent facts can be reasonable suspicion on the totality. Here, defendant’s lie about being armed in his car was reasonable suspicion. If the only issue was possession of a firearm, precedent says that’s not reasonable suspicion. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Having a gun in your car is not RS, but lying about not having one is when the officer sees it

CNN: Police used AI facial recognition to arrest a Tennessee woman for crimes committed in a state she says she’s never visited

CNN: Police used AI facial recognition to arrest a Tennessee woman for crimes committed in a state she says she’s never visited by Zoe Sottile (“A Tennessee grandmother spent more than five months in jail after police used an AI … Continue reading

Posted in Facial recognition | Comments Off on CNN: Police used AI facial recognition to arrest a Tennessee woman for crimes committed in a state she says she’s never visited

CA6: Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing

Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing. United States v. Carney, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 8792 (6th Cir. Mar. 24, 2026). There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s frisk, and the gun found is suppressed. United … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Occasionally spending the night at the place searched doesn’t give standing

OR: A year of public internet portal monitoring required a warrant under OR Const.

A year of monitoring of internet use at a public portal where the company providing the portal cooperated with the police was state action. “[T]he state’s year-long surveillance of defendant’s internet activities was a search under Article I, section 9.” … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Search | Comments Off on OR: A year of public internet portal monitoring required a warrant under OR Const.

E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

The military search authorization here was sufficiently particular and works in federal court. United States v. Guinsler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63922 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2026). (§ 52.39 n.3). The state stipulated to a false fact in the search … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

The smell of marijuana in a car alone isn’t probable cause in Ohio anymore because of legalization, quoting State v. Gray, 2025-Ohio-4607, ¶ 61 (1st Dist. Oct. 3, 2025). State v. Tucker, 2026-Ohio-1045 (8th Dist. Mar. 26, 2026). Challenging only … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

“Having considered the rationale justifying protective sweeps, we hold, as a matter of first impression, that probation officers conducting lawful compliance checks in a residence may conduct a protective sweep to the same extent and are subject to the same … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Protective sweep | Comments Off on ID: POs may do protective sweeps of a house same any other officer

ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

“[W]e hold that a finding that there was a lawful separate or independent investigation underway is not a per se requirement in every case for the inevitable discovery doctrine to apply. While a separate, untainted investigation may be the simplest … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

The Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception. Madaio v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64418 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2026). When defendant was stopped, the officers had reasonable suspicion the car had been involved in a shooting … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception