Author Archives: Hall

CA9: State officers can consider federal crimes in assessing PC

The district court erred three ways in this case: The potential of a federal crime could be considered by the officer in determining probable cause. There was reasonable suspicion to prolong the stop. The automobile exception applied. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: State officers can consider federal crimes in assessing PC

N.D.Ohio: Pole camera view into second story window of house was unreasonable search, but govt prevails anyway

A second story pole camera that actually could see into defendant’s house was unreasonable as to that. But, “[b]ecause there is an independent basis for upholding the validity of the search warrant, this Court will not suppress the evidence seized … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Pole camera view into second story window of house was unreasonable search, but govt prevails anyway

CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

“The crux of the Gammarinos’ [Fourth Amendment] argument is that the Defendants entered their properties and removed their personal property without a warrant. As a result, they claim these searches and seizures are presumptively unreasonable and thus violated the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search | Comments Off on CA6: Entering land to post a notice of civil infraction from the property was not a “search”

E.D.La.: Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable

Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39113 (E.D. La. Mar. 5, 2025):

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Pursuing fleeing drug dealer into an apartment was reasonable

CA6: Nexus to home based on controlled buys doesn’t require constant visual surveillance

Controlled buys that included trips to defendant’s house was nexus. “Regardless of whether Sims was constantly within the detectives’ view, the affidavit establishes that for each controlled buy, Sims went straight to the buy location from the residence and returned … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Nexus to home based on controlled buys doesn’t require constant visual surveillance

D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

Defense counsel’s acceptance of a warrant was a waiver of the service requirements for a warrant in Rule 41. It was also otherwise valid. United States v. Reynoso, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40555 (D.P.R. Mar. 4, 2025). “The search and … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Defense counsel’s agreement to accept a SW was waiver of Rule 41 service requirements

CA10: A Franks violation can’t be based on information that had not been discovered yet

The affidavit showed probable cause. And, “Detective Ames did not knowingly or recklessly omit exculpatory information from the affidavit because she was not aware of any such information when she prepared the affidavit.” Weidner v. McHale, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: A Franks violation can’t be based on information that had not been discovered yet

Fed.Cir.: VA’s IT user inspection rule violates 4A

The VA’s rule-based IT inspection authority for remote access to its databases is overbroad and violates the Fourth Amendment because it includes remote computers and the place where the computers are housed. Military-Veterans Advoc. v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on Fed.Cir.: VA’s IT user inspection rule violates 4A

CA10: The district court properly held that officers climbing over a fence to get to ptf’s front door was a 4A violation, but QI applies, still

Officers came to plaintiff’s property to investigate a marijuana grow. His property was surrounded by a fence, and he didn’t respond to air horns to get his attention, so they climbed over the fence to be able to get to … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: The district court properly held that officers climbing over a fence to get to ptf’s front door was a 4A violation, but QI applies, still

WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

Warning of a right to refuse a consent search is only required for knock-and-talk. This was an animal cruelty case, and officers had been there repeatedly to observe horses with consent. Finally, they got a warrant to enter the enclosure … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on WA: Warning of right to refuse consent search only applies to knock-and-talk

S.D.N.Y.: Regularly posting whereabouts on social media helps show nexus to cell phone

Officers keyed on defendant as a shooting suspect because of a social media post from a year before with him wearing what appear to be the pants worn by the shooter. As for nexus to defendant’s phone, they rely on … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Regularly posting whereabouts on social media helps show nexus to cell phone

NYT: The Persistent Problem of Stop and Frisk

NYT: The Persistent Problem of Stop and Frisk by Shayla Colon (“New York Police Department supervisors failed to rein in unlawful stops, frisks and searches by anti-crime units in 2023, a monitor said in a new report.”)

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on NYT: The Persistent Problem of Stop and Frisk

TX2: Concurring opinion where SW wasn’t based on PC

A concurring opinion where there wasn’t probable cause for a search warrant, which is really hard to do these days: Staley v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 1523 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Mar. 6, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX2: Concurring opinion where SW wasn’t based on PC

W.D.Mich.: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements are an unreasonable search

The Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements amount to an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. Small Bus. Ass’n of Mich. v. Yellen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40975 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 3, 2025):

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements are an unreasonable search

W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

Defendant lost a motion to suppress but won a speedy trial dismissal without prejudice. Reindicted, he filed another motion to suppress, but law of the case applies. United States v. Bell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41924 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 7, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress the search of his cell phone in a murder case. On the state’s interlocutory appeal, suppression is reversed. There was sufficient nexus shown between the cell phone and the offense under investigation … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on TN: Nexus shown to cell phone in murder case

CA2: 50 days of pole camera surveillance outside a business wasn’t unreasonable search

A pole camera outside defendant’s business for 50 days was not an unreasonable search. United States v. Harry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 5329 (2d Cir. Mar. 7, 2025). Defendant was improperly denied a hearing. The codefendant had a suppression hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: 50 days of pole camera surveillance outside a business wasn’t unreasonable search

OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

Information in the affidavit for warrant about a 2021 overdose was valid background and not stale information. State v. Martin, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 727 (6th Dist. Mar. 7, 2025). Officers getting a search warrant to enter to arrest was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness | Comments Off on OH6: Background information didn’t make SW affidavit stale

Law.com: Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment

Law.com: Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Law.com: Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment

techspot: EFF launches open-source tool that can detect unauthorized cellular spying

techspot: EFF launches open-source tool that can detect unauthorized cellular spying by Skye Jacobs:

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Cell site simulators | Comments Off on techspot: EFF launches open-source tool that can detect unauthorized cellular spying