Author Archives: Hall

Bloomberg: Google Keyword Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers

Bloomberg Law: Google Keyword-Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers (“Lawyers for the arson case defendant maintain that Google must search billions of users to respond to keyword search warrants, raising privacy implications far beyond Colorado. ‘This is a really significant new … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Google Keyword Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers

M.D.Pa.: Refusal to show hands when ordered shows no seizure

Defendant’s refusal to show his hands when ordered to by the officer was not a seizure. United States v. Garner, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5400 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2023).* Defendant’s stop was justified and it escalated to reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Refusal to show hands when ordered shows no seizure

CA6: New information about a search doesn’t qualify for successor habeas

Alleged new information about the search of defendant’s property doesn’t allege actual innocence and thus is not grounds for a successor habeas. In re Fisher, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 677 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). 2255 petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim on … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: New information about a search doesn’t qualify for successor habeas

IA: State failure to object to lack of Franks preliminary showing results in hearing, but def fails anyway

Defendant got a Franks hearing without an adequate showing, and the state didn’t object. So the court of appeals considers the showing at the hearing over the state’s objection, and defendant fails to show recklessness or intentional false statement or … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: State failure to object to lack of Franks preliminary showing results in hearing, but def fails anyway

IA: “Driving while black” rejected because stop was objectively reasonable

Defendant sought to cast his stop as pretextual and “driving while black,” but it’s rejected because the stop was objectively reasonable. “We conclude that while the officer’s actions placed Cyrus in a situation with an unarguable ‘moral and instinctive pressure[ … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Pretext | Comments Off on IA: “Driving while black” rejected because stop was objectively reasonable

CA4: Terry stop is not necessarily custody for Miranda purposes

A Terry stop is not necessarily custody for Miranda purposes. They can be, but they focus on different questions. United States v. Leggette, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 521 n.5 (4th Cir. Jan. 10, 2023). Collective knowledge of the officers involved … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Custody | Comments Off on CA4: Terry stop is not necessarily custody for Miranda purposes

D.N.J.: No 6A right to have counsel present at execution of a DNA warrant in the jail

There is no Sixth Amendment right for counsel to be present when a DNA sample is taken from defendant at the jail by warrant. United States v. Hubbard, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3661 (D.N.J. Jan. 9, 2023). CBP had reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Computer and cloud searches, DNA, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on D.N.J.: No 6A right to have counsel present at execution of a DNA warrant in the jail

CA8: An attempted arrest isn’t a seizure, even without PC

“However, an attempted arrest alone, even if unsupported by probable cause, is insufficient to invoke Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizures. See Hodari D., 499 U.S. at 626 (‘The word “seizure” … does not remotely apply … to the prospect … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: An attempted arrest isn’t a seizure, even without PC

CA7: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives SJ because it stated a claim

“Here, a reasonable jury could find that Buonadonna intentionally or recklessly included material false statements and withheld material exculpatory information. Buonadonna admits that he read the protective order and knew that it did not bar communication between Klein and Salatas. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf’s civil Franks claim survives SJ because it stated a claim

IL: Officers executing SW lawfully seized gun in plain view

The trial court erred in suppressing evidence. The officers were lawfully on the premises with a warrant when a gun was seen in plain view. People v. Serrato, 2023 IL App (2d) 220100, 2023 Ill. App. LEXIS 3 (Jan. 6, … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Officers executing SW lawfully seized gun in plain view

CA5: No suppression for no-knock violation

There is no suppression remedy for an unjustified no-knock warrant. United States v. Bryant, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 355 (5th Cir. Jan. 6, 2023). Defendant didn’t enter a conditional plea, so his guilty plea waived his Fourth Amendment claim. United … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Nexus, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: No suppression for no-knock violation

CA6: Govt completely failed to show nexus or PC thus no GFE

The affidavits supporting the records warrant for defendant’s home did not establish nexus between his alleged drug activity, drug records, and his address. Also, the affidavit did not allege that defendant dealt drugs from the house or that he even … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Protective sweep, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA6: Govt completely failed to show nexus or PC thus no GFE

Army: Remotely wiping seized cell phone and watch tampered with search

The prosecution established defendant interfered with a search by remotely wiping her cell phone and watch when she knew they were in the possession of CID and to be searched in a manslaughter investigation. United States v. Strong, 2023 CCA … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Digital Searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on Army: Remotely wiping seized cell phone and watch tampered with search

E.D.Tex.: Govt failed to prove traffic offenses or any RS for stop

There was no justification for defendant’s traffic stop based on two statutes that weren’t violated. The government’s assertion of reasonable suspicion from an anonymous tip also failed. United States v. Salazar, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234747 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 12, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Govt failed to prove traffic offenses or any RS for stop

Intelligencer: Amazon’s New Car Cam Takes Personal Surveillance on the Road

Intelligencer: Amazon’s New Car Cam Takes Personal Surveillance on the Road by John Hermann (“Amazon on Thursday opened preorders for a long-awaited addition to its vast catalogue of Ring personal surveillance devices: the Car Cam. Starting at $200, the car … Continue reading

Posted in Video surveillance | Comments Off on Intelligencer: Amazon’s New Car Cam Takes Personal Surveillance on the Road

CA6: Plastic bag on car console wasn’t obviously “dope” to justify automobile exception

The government argued that the search of defendant’s car was justified by the automobile exception because contraband was in plain view. The court disagrees. There was a plastic bag on the console, and the photographic evidence from inside the car … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: Plastic bag on car console wasn’t obviously “dope” to justify automobile exception

S.D.Cal.: Databases checked by probation officers showed def was still on probation before probation search; GFE applies

Defendant claimed his probation search was unreasonable because he was off probation when the search occurred. All the evidence, however, shows that the officers acted in good faith because they checked databases, and it all showed he was still on … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Databases checked by probation officers showed def was still on probation before probation search; GFE applies

SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

The state 1971 constitutional amendment recognizing a right to privacy was really enacting what the people always believed about privacy. It provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Prison and jail searches, State constitution, Strip search | Comments Off on SC Const. search and seizure and privacy provision protects abortion rights; Idaho says theirs doesn’t

CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

The officer’s stop of plaintiff to flirt with her was without basis and thus unreasonable, and clearly established. Shepherd v. Robbins, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 36056 (10th Cir. Dec. 13, 2022) [corrected Dec. 28, 2022]. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: Traffic stop to flirt with motorist was unreasonable, and clearly established that cause needed

D.Minn.: Issuance of an arrest warrant can justify a tracking warrant for suspect

“The Court agrees with essential premise of the R&R: that probable cause existed for the tracking warrant because there was probable cause for the arrest warrant. First, Mr. Ellerman cites no authority for the idea that using a judicially approved … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Issuance of an arrest warrant can justify a tracking warrant for suspect