Author Archives: Hall

KY: Defs showed enough to get a post-conviction hearing officers planted drugs they pled guilty to

Defendants moved to vacate guilty pleas for drug possession after the officers involved were federally indicted for planting drugs on suspects. The trial court denied without a hearing because of the guilty pleas. The CoA reversed and ordered a hearing. … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on KY: Defs showed enough to get a post-conviction hearing officers planted drugs they pled guilty to

OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

The state could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search. State v. Roberts, 2023-Ohio-142, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 131 (6th Dist. Jan. 18, 2023). The facts in isolation may not show reasonable suspicion but … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OH6: State could get a jury instruction that defendant refused to submit to a DNA search

E.D.Tenn.: Backyard firepit was part of curtilage

A firepit in defendant’s yard (an “outdoor living area”) was part of the curtilage. The officer, however, was lawfully on the curtilage for a knock-and-talk. United States v. Thurman, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9358 (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 19, 2023).* Sometimes … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Backyard firepit was part of curtilage

CA2: Arrested at gunpoint, handcuffed, and unMirandized, def still consented

Defendant had been arrested and handcuffed and officers had weapons drawn, and he hadn’t yet been Mirandized. Still, on the totality, he consented to the search. United States v. Collins, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1257 (2d Cir. Jan. 19, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA2: Arrested at gunpoint, handcuffed, and unMirandized, def still consented

S.D.Ill.: When moving to suppress “data” one has to be specific

Defendant’s motion to suppress “data” and “associated data” fails because of his failure to show what and where it was or could be. (It kind of becomes a general motion to suppress.) United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: When moving to suppress “data” one has to be specific

AR: Claim state’s response to motion to suppress was judicial admission has to be presented to trial court

To argue that the state’s admissions in a response to a motion to suppress amount to a judicial admission of fact, the issue has to be argued to the trial court to preserve it. Otherwise, the trial court is free … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of pleading, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Claim state’s response to motion to suppress was judicial admission has to be presented to trial court

CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

Officer’s failure to turn on his bodycam before frisk here doesn’t require an adverse inference of destruction of evidence. Bad faith isn’t shown. United States v. Aguirre-Cuenca, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1105 (4th Cir. Jan. 18, 2023). Defendant’s appeal is … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA4: Failure to turn on bodycam before frisk not shown to be in bad faith

By 2022, one would think that all would know planning a crime with Google searches would be incriminating; but no

Yahoo news: Brian Walshe pleads not guilty to murder: Everything we know about the case: In court Wednesday, prosecutor Lynn Beland said investigators believe Brian Walshe dismembered his wife and disposed of her remains after using their son’s iPad to … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on By 2022, one would think that all would know planning a crime with Google searches would be incriminating; but no

CA5: GFE to scope of search moots inquiring into PC

Because the good faith exception applied to the scope of search, the merits of the justification for the warrant is moot. United States v. Edwards, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 1032 (5th Cir. Jan. 17, 2023). A passenger didn’t have standing … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: GFE to scope of search moots inquiring into PC

S.D.N.Y.: Pending recalculation of time on parole didn’t affect legality of parole search

Defendant’s state remaining parole time was subjected to recalculation but it hadn’t happened by the time of the parole search based on a tip he had a firearm. Therefore it was reasonable. Alternatively, it was by consent. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Pending recalculation of time on parole didn’t affect legality of parole search

NC: Officer who had knowledge of driver’s medical disqualification from driving could make a stop

“Therefore, a law enforcement officer with either probable cause or reasonable suspicion to believe that the driver of a vehicle is driving with a medically canceled license may conduct a lawful traffic stop of that vehicle without running afoul of … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Officer who had knowledge of driver’s medical disqualification from driving could make a stop

DE: State habeas not for 4A claims

A state habeas petition is not how one presents a Fourth Amendment claim. Chrisden v. State, 2023 Del. LEXIS 17 (Jan. 13, 2023). Defendant’s traffic stop was factually justified. The smell of marijuana and his admissions gave probable cause to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: State habeas not for 4A claims

W.D.N.Y.: Moving car without PC for later dog sniff hours later tainted SW based on dog alert

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped and ultimately removed to another location for a dog sniff to get probable cause for a search warrant for the car. The removal was unreasonable and justified under the Fourth Amendment. The dog sniff was several … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Moving car without PC for later dog sniff hours later tainted SW based on dog alert

E.D.Tenn.: 11 day delay in getting computer SW not unreasonable

Depending on how one counted the time between the seizure of the cell phone and the search warrant, it was either 3 or 11 days, and either is reasonable. United States v. Deakins, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6661 (E.D. Tenn. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: 11 day delay in getting computer SW not unreasonable

CA6: Erroneous LEO database info still justified stop

Officers had information from the state DL and LPN database that defendant’s car had no insurance. That justified the stop even if it turned out to be erroneous. United States v. Conley, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 856 (6th Cir. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Erroneous LEO database info still justified stop

E.D.N.Y.: Without knowing what to suppress, motion to suppress is premature

Defendant’s motion to suppress the search of Device A is premature since the product of the search isn’t yet known. Also, his motion to suppress the search of Device B is denied for lack of standing. It isn’t his. United … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Without knowing what to suppress, motion to suppress is premature

CA6: Potential defenses don’t undermine PC for arrest

Potential defenses to a case plaintiff was arrested for do not nullify the probable cause. Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 865 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023):

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Potential defenses don’t undermine PC for arrest

CA6: Anonymous tip shown reliable enough for probation search

This anonymous tip of criminality of a probationer was shown to be reliable enough for reasonable suspicion. United States v. Rogers, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 786 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). Defendant is accused of vandalizing the Anchorage Jewish Museum. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Anonymous tip shown reliable enough for probation search

CA6: Water heard running in hotel room bathroom supported exigency for avoiding destruction of evidence

Water heard running in the bathroom of a hotel room justified entry to avoid potential destruction of evidence. United States v. Hill, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 785 (6th Cir. Jan. 11, 2023). Defendant’s Franks challenge doesn’t undermine the two critical … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Water heard running in hotel room bathroom supported exigency for avoiding destruction of evidence

Bloomberg: Google Keyword Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers

Bloomberg Law: Google Keyword-Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers (“Lawyers for the arson case defendant maintain that Google must search billions of users to respond to keyword search warrants, raising privacy implications far beyond Colorado. ‘This is a really significant new … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Bloomberg: Google Keyword Search Warrants Questioned by Colorado Lawyers