N.D.Iowa: When an officer has PC for a stop and search, the 4A doesn’t require that it happen at the earliest possible time

When an officer has probable cause for a stop and search, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t require that it happen at the earliest possible time. It doesn’t become “stale” that fast, and here it was ongoing: driving on a suspended DL. [And, it can be delayed to see what else happens.] United States v. Harbach, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38363 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 25, 2026).

Defendant’s trial objection to a second cell phone extraction was evidentiary foundation, not unreasonable search, so that’s waived for appeal. State v. Augustus, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 369 (La. App. 5 Cir Feb. 25, 2026).*

“Defendant finally argues that the State failed to prove specific intent. However, video footage of defendant’s statement demonstrated that it was at the moment Detective Gai asked defendant to unlock the phone so the search warrant could be performed that he threw it on the floor and destroyed it. These facts support a finding that defendant knew the cell phone was relevant to the investigation of his involvement with the homicide, and he intended to ‘distort the results’ by destroying the cell phone. Accordingly, we find that the evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for obstruction of justice.” State v. Hudson, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 365 (La. App. 5 Cir Feb. 25, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Staleness, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.